The most banal trading strategy - page 54
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
is some new concept in trading that I am not yet familiar with :-)
I'll take that as a yes.
If I am not mistaken, it is called "safe haven".this is some new concept in trading, not yet known to me :-)
Kipish is an altered word, modified over time, the name of one of the old criminal trades - hippies. This business was born in Odessa and consisted of the following: a young pretty woman hippies would lure a victim-fraught to her flat allegedly for love-making.
Transferred to trading, a similar thing probably happens when victims are lured to enter in the direction of a false breakdown. The result is well known: after a reversal, the victims' stops are triggered).
It is worth opening an economics textbook, a couple of books from 10-20 years ago (not poisoned by traders) "currency operations" and "banking";
Of course, your brain explodes at first sight, but the course becomes clearer and you do fewer stupid things.
recommend something.
Kipish is an altered word, changed over time, of the name of one of the old criminal trades - hippies. It was born in Odessa and consisted in the following: a young, pretty woman hippie would lure a victim-freak to a flat, supposedly to make love to her.
Transferred to trading, a similar thing probably happens when victims are lured to enter in the direction of a false breakdown. The result is well known: after a reversal, the victims' stops are triggered).
)))
This, Yes. A dubious event-misunderstanding.
PS Exit!
Continuing on with "THE MOST BANAL"
----
We take the last 3 events (no difference buy/sell, we don't distinguish open/close, just control points) from the "not-so-banal".
In theory, is it possible to build a derivative TS on this ?
And if so, would it be more profitable ( less risky) than the original one...
----
my guess is no. Except that the original never loses.
Continuing on with "THE MOST BANAL"
----
We take the last 3 events (no difference buy/sell, we don't distinguish open/close, just control points) from the "not-so-banal".
In theory, is it possible to build a derivative TS on this ?
And if so, would it be more profitable ( less risky) than the original one...
----
my guess is no. Except that the original never loses.
but what about copying the signal or it is not a derivative TS?
Personally, I think you can.
what about signal copying or is it not a derivative of TC?
personally i think you can.
with full information - direct copying, without the slightest delay and in the same conditions, is just a duplicate. Not more profitable not more unprofitable.
But there is no information about the direction of the trade. buy or sell ?
in my suggestion, there are 2 more control points like this to decide...
---
or how many checkpoints do you need?
with full information - direct copying, without the slightest delay and in the same conditions, is simply a duplicate. Not more profitable not more unprofitable.
But there is no information about the direction of the transaction. buy or sell ?
in my suggestion, there are 2 more control points like this to decide...
---
or how many control points do you need?
i.e. in essence you offered to train the TS on previous trades.
i suggest that the system can be implemented as a neuron.
i can use the number of previous trades as a parameter.
Well, that's interesting.
that is, you have essentially proposed to train the TS on previous trades.
I suggest that the system can be implemented as a neuron.
The system has a parameter - the number of previous trades on some conventional technology.
well, interesting.
even more interesting, if option 3 is "ignore".
In general, induction kind of says that this is impossible - the derivative of TC over the N control points will be no better than the original.
even more interestingly, if option 3 is possible - "ignore".
Generally speaking, induction kind of says that it is impossible - the derivative of a TS over N control points will be no better than the original.
Just neural networks destroy such thoughts, as it is their way of working - not to do things as they turn out badly.
The only BUT. They, like all other TCs, are only able to view what has happened within a narrow framework.
That is they cannot divide: trend / flat.
;)