MT5 is for programmers, not traders - page 10
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Zielinski, don't embarrass yourself! Before you talk about SB, at least raise your level to average. MQ consultants my ass!
"Useful" Sokolov -- I'm not judging SB level, if you read carefully what I wrote -- I'm just saying that SB is not good for learning mql5 from scratch -- that's my opinion, if you don't like it or don't understand it, then you may pass by
And why is SB a black box, all the sources are there. I don't even look at Hel with its description, it's faster and more informative to dive into .mqh and see what's done and how it's done. And everything is done simply, even primitively, you just need to know a little bit about OOP.
Not all of it;)
The SB is a silent horror.
You have to understand that SB was written by different people, and although it contains a unified code style, it is in fact very different in design quality. There is a feeling that in the beginning the SB was written by skilled people and then this work was outsourced to weaker programmers. Well, then the completion of the SB began to send Juns (like "you there finished somehow, just to be something").
s.s. By the way the trade part of the SB although not perfect, but compared with other parts, a solid four. The first one is the first one, and the second one is the second one, and the third one is the second one.
Where in the reference is the forcible shoving of SB? Please show me.
A Google search like thissite:mql5.com/en/docs/"include "+"mqh"-"Standard Library" is .
Nowadays, it seems to be fashionable to justify one's own inferiority by the presence of third-party open source code. According to this logic, GitHub should be banned from Roskomnadzor forever: it hinders novice programmers with its various codes.
So you have to be specific. What does MK have to do with it?
The MC is the mastermind of the "fashion" of SB for newbies - seehttps://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/481
Googling a query like thissite:mql5.com/en/docs/"include "+"mqh"-"Standard Library" comes up
When I learned my first Fortran language, back in 1985, and wrote part of my diploma in radio calculation, I didn't even have a computer. My teacher gave me a printed manual on an alphabet printer, a la typewriter; older people may remember those for ECMs, which made a rattling noise as the text was printed with letters jumping around in height and of disgusting quality. Such a short guide to the language and a list of functions. Not even close to a textbook, a translation of a short reference book from English.
....
And nothing brought the cyntrifuge to fruition, sold it to the then LatvBioPharm, and made a lot of money. Then there was more development for them before the Union collapsed.
I am not bragging, I am just telling you about the real conditions of those years, as today's pampered complainers would not have survived back then.
It was a disaster, frankly.
In 1985 I was introduced to a programmable calculator (thanks to Tekhnika-Young magazine). Before that - I was strictly focused on radioelectronics, but from that moment - I began to move more and more to programming. At first - in calculator commands... Then there was the I8080 assembler and BASIC on the EC-1010 at the institute... Then x86 assembler and then C++ as MSVC.