categorically disagree !
Created, in a great many instances and variations. There are both here and on other sites.
But there is a nuance - without a "pad between the steering wheel and the seat" it does not go :-) More precisely, it is profitable, then it is not, the sum minus the spread.
The most perfect neuron network (may be quantum one, who knows) in the known universe, cannot be excluded from a scheme money-man-robot-exchange-money.
And competent use/management of almost any EA, even on the level of on/off time, makes the scheme profitable and more reliable than without EA
The bottom line of this opus is: trading doesn't work without a human, without EAs is too unreliable/risky.
PS/ Emelya's dream: to catch a pike once (find a robot) and not to make any more efforts at all, is on the young minds' minds. Some of them are old enough.
PS/ Emelya's dream: to catch a pike once (find a robot) and not to make any more efforts at all, is on the young minds' minds. Some till old age.
I don't like to give out EAs, but I'll post one on the market especially for you... :-)
I just need to read the new rules, something has been changed there
If there are clear rules, they can be programmed. If the rules are joined by intuition, the robot is powerless.
If there are clear rules, they can be programmed. If the rules are complemented by intuition, the robot is powerless here.
Trading hands is exhausting)
And to think in general...
We are in the 21st century, cars already drive themselves)
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.