From theory to practice - page 968
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
we're clearly back to theory...
Let's talk about the stops...
Theory is theory, but practice is the problem.
OKAY. Stops are virtual. Where the stop, there is a reversal on the same volumes.
:-) No kidding - the stop is behind the level. And waiting for a new entry - that's not about me...
OK. Stops are virtual. Where the stop is, there's a flip on the same volumes.
:-) No kidding - the stop is behind the level. And waiting for a new entry - that's not about me...
so the branch is affected - IMHO, we need to be substantive. Reverse TS in the absence of take and stops.
so the branch is affected - IMHO, we need to be substantive. Turnaround TS with no takeaways and no stops.
I support your opinion.
It has to be either or.
so the branch is affected - IMHO, we need to be substantive. Reverse TS in the absence of take and stops.
Maybe it's just a little bit too much.) (It's faster to get bogged down, we're not talking about the topic of the thread...))
The part about flips. It's all individual... Strongly early statistical entries against the trend, give profits after the flip. Flood surrendered)))))))
About the coup de grâce to the League ;)
:-) I think it's also possible to fly away with this approach...
:-) I think it's also possible to fly away with this approach...
...
But the problem of losing orders, no matter how few there are, has not gone away)
As an alternative: if the loss of an order reaches a certain preset level, we lock it. And when the aggregate position reaches a certain preset profit level, we should close all the orders.
It would be boring without Georgi, unique optimism!
:-) Not him, but the flips on the same volume.