You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It's not a trend here, it's a rambling mess.
Random wandering )):
If to me the author of this thread should write a big poster with the most important trader's wisdom - Trend is a Friend and read it a hundred times a day like a prayer, then his trading may begin.
Random rambling )):
In general, I think the author of this thread should write a big poster with the most important trader's wisdom - Trend My Friend, and read it a hundred times a day, like a prayer, then his trading may go better.
Randomness is not involved in the definition of information.
You are mistaken. A meaningful concept of information (not a chattering concept, but one that allows you to express it numerically) was first introduced by Claude Shannon, based on a probabilistic model of randomness.
You are mistaken. A meaningful concept of information (not a chattering concept, but one that allows you to express it numerically) was first introduced by Claude Shannon, based on a probabilistic model of randomness.
You have only a part of information about information, and that part, although not insignificant, is still of an auxiliary value.
One must not reduce the notion of information to a narrow Shannon definition, concerning the carrying capacity of a communication channel (C.Shannon's information theory). To ignore the meaning of a message and the significance of the meaning of a message for sender and receiver is to misunderstand the problem in its entirety.
Take a look at the big picture, for starters:
http://terme.ru/termin/informacija.html#item-5215
You are mistaken. Claude Shannon was the first to introduce a meaningful notion of information (not chattering, but giving the possibility to express it numerically), based on a probabilistic model of randomness.
And in general, I've noticed for some time that almost every statement of mine causes a furious spirit of contradiction with you.
Why should that be? ;)))
This suggests that we are facing some kind of symbiosis of an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck type SB process and a memory process.
If there were no emissions, my TS would be 100% profitable, and he who asserts that it is impossible to make money on SB is imbecile. On a coin, I don't know, but on an OM, it's easy.
And it's impossible to eliminate these outliers in tails - this has also been proven in this thread. You have to live with them somehow... How? No answer...
SB and op-amp are fundamentally different processes, don't confuse them or they will laugh at you. Opu is stationary and with memory, SB is non-stationary and without it.
Well, take range-bars and you will not have any tails. There will only be two sticks in the distribution.
It's not about tails.
let me read it.)
What's the name of the book?
Do you understand game theory? In its differential formulation? I gave you a link to Pontryagin's work. Have you got it? If not, I strongly recommend you to do it.
You have only part of the information about information. And this part, although not insignificant, is still of ancillary importance.
You cannot reduce the concept of information to a narrow Shannon definition of the bandwidth of a communication channel (C.Shannon's information theory). To ignore the meaning of a message and the significance of the meaning of a message for sender and receiver is to misunderstand the problem in its entirety.
Take a look at the big picture, for starters:
http://terme.ru/termin/informacija.html#item-5215
Well yes, as I wrote - chatter. It is impossible to calculate anything without the Shannon approach.
As Wikipedia says: "The emergence of information theory is associated with the publication of Claude Shannon's The Mathematical Theory of Communication in 1948."
Well, yes, as I wrote - chattering. It is impossible to calculate anything without the Shannon approach.
As Wikipedia says: "The emergence of information theory is linked to Claude Shannon's publication of The Mathematical Theory of Communication in 1948."
There you go again, persisting in your misunderstanding.