From theory to practice - page 689

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

I think it's 100 percent.

and with this kind of profit (or close to it ;):


Brief and to the point.))

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

Brief and to the point)))

No, actually.

in forex too:

66.67% to the organiser, 33.33% to the player

and if you subtract 2*spread, commissions, swaps, then it's less than 1/3

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

No, actually.

In forex too:

66.67% to the organiser, 33.33% to the player.

and if you subtract 2*spread, commissions, swaps, then it's less than 1/3

Normal distribution, like in a factory. Many workers also resent being underpaid. Why should we close the factory because of them?

 
The level of the forum is clear to me. I'll watch the end of the film. Just curious.
 
Oleg Papkov:
The level of the forum is clear to me, I'll watch the end of the film. Just curious.

Did you think that was right? :

"Let's say an instrument is trending upwards. If we make a trade, let's say BUY, the liquidity provider sells to us. He makes an SELL trade. "

He's not committing anything, he's just racing the quote against the baeks (if there are more) until it disappears or locks or goes out on a stop or collapses the hard earned or etc.,

Eventually, it's more of a story.

 
Oleg Papkov:
The level of the forum is clear to me. I'll watch the end of the movie. Just curious.

Is it really that bad? What's missing? What's in excess?


It's a normal working environment:


 
Олег avtomat:

Is it really that bad? What's missing? What's in excess?


A normal working environment :


On forums, like a general bathhouse, everyone is equal, but some are more equal.

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

On forums, like a general bathhouse, everyone is equal, but some are more equal.

о... spoke up... something in the woods died?

 
So how's the progress on the Gunn and gamma distributions?
 
I wonder if you've figured out the idea, or if it's a complete mess.
Reason: