From theory to practice - page 1092
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Just decided to apply this formula to the minute increments in the sliding window t = 240 minutes.
Here's what came up.
1. I made a mistake, of course. The formula looks like this:
The X axis is a uniform scale of event counts (1, 2, ...)
Y-axis - value S^2=(Tn-Tn-1)^2-(PRICEn-PRICEn-1)^2.
Sign "-" instead of "+".
2. The sliding window should not be present in the calculations.
3. I will personally build such a graph for non-uniform time intervals between quotes.
4. You should look at 2 charts - a price chart and a chart of this spatial time interval S. The objective is to identify patterns in price movements.
By the way, yes. maybe.
but the news came out at 10:30 and the movement started as early as 10:15.
insiders?
at 10:15 was the French PMI and also worse than forecast.
Studying the news is the first step in studying the market properly, without the anti-scientific heresy about puppets, conspiracy theories etc.
1. I was, of course, mistaken. The formula looks like this:
The X axis is a uniform scale of event counts (1, 2, ...)
Y-axis - value S^2=(Tn-Tn-1)^2-(PRICEn-PRICEn-1)^2.
The sign "-" instead of "+".
What is the physical meaning of S?
With a plus sign it makes sense, with a minus sign I don't see the meaning yet.
at 10:15 was the French PMI and also worse than forecast.
Studying the news is the first step in proper market research, without the anti-scientific heresy about dolts, conspiracy theories and so on.
What is the physical meaning of S?
With a plus sign it made sense, with a minus sign I don't see the point yet.
:))). At first I was confused - I wrote a formula for distances according to Pythagoras' theorem...
And Minkowski's is exactly "-". For non-Euclidean spaces - exactly so. I don't know why. We have to look at the derivation of the formula... But the meaning is the same - distance, only in another space. Minkowski space.
And Minkowski's is exactly "-". For non-Euclidean spaces it is exactly so. Who knows why. It is necessary to see the derivation of the formula... But the meaning is the same - distance, only in another space. Minkowski space.
Using things, the essence of which we do not understand, is a sure way to failure).
Maybe Minkowski just didn't get the vertical line from the plus?)
And yes, where to see Minkowski's state, remind me?
Using things we don't understand is a sure way to fail)
Maybe... But, in my drowning state, I am grasping at any straw.
And yes, where can I see Minkowski's state, remind me?
Bass, you're on fire :))) Hilarious... Bravo!
:))). I first got confused - I wrote a formula for distances according to the Pythagorean theorem...
And Minkowski's is exactly "-". For non-Euclidean spaces - exactly so. I don't know why. We have to look at the derivation of the formula... But the meaning is the same - distance, only in another space. Minkowski space.
Let me put it this way.
I used a similar formula when I was a kid to pull grannies off the handicap.
but anyway, I was pulling it all the same
Now let's discuss
Tn-Tn-1=-1 when time is counted in steps equal to a second, e.g.?
then
(Tn-Tn-1)^2 is obviously 1
Why are you making this so hard?
so it will be 4, or 9, or 16
what difference does it make?
Personally, I've always had 1 there, and the rest of the formula is derived by sense.
Let me put it this way.
I used a similar formula when I was a kid to pull grannies off the handicap.
but anyway, I'm pulling it.
now let's discuss
Tn-Tn-1=-1 when time counts in steps equal to a second, for example?
then
(Tn-Tn-1)^2 is obviously 1.
Why are you making this so hard?
No one is complicating things. I personally am going to work with non-empty second TFs, when in 1, 2, 3... seconds was at least one tick. The time intervals there are inherently non-linear.
And going to Minkowski distances will just give a picture in a linear reference frame. I don't know what it will be. I hope it's a sine wave :)))