From theory to practice - page 1096

 
Martin Cheguevara:

it looks something like this

ahahaaa


:)))

So in dicer format it's two thousand.

 

I wonder if it's possible to patent the robot as an invention.

It seems to have about five inventions in it...

 
Martin Cheguevara:

it took me 3000 lines of code a lot of original geometric solutions and i still understand what i wrote there and it still manages to work correctly - wonders ahah))

that's not counting the trading system itself with its pile of checks and automated fixes of all sorts of errors right up to the server disconnect

amazing

it's only 4 lines.

 
Aleksey Panfilov:

I suppose it would take about fifty pages to spell it out on the fingers, and if in the format of a dissertation it would take about a thousand. )))

the opposing crowds willy-nilly trade in exposures which are taken as fibos,
parsing the big pie is always linear

and these beauties in both sides in all scales :-)

add more lines at the end-beginning - they indicate an increased volatility or volume (which is actually the same thing).

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

awwww

it's only 4 lines

yeah... The only problem is the absolute objective adaptability to the market))))

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

wow

It's only four lines.

A little more - eight lines.
 
Martin Cheguevara:

yeah... The only problem is the absolute objective adaptability to the market.)

and if you think about it even harder, there's one
 
Martin Cheguevara:

I wonder if it's possible to patent the robot as an invention.

it seems to have five inventions in it...

you could do it as a program.

but as a theory, that's a different story.

 
Renat Akhtyamov:
and if you think about it even cooler, then one.

If it is even cooler, then none at all - immediately connect the terminal to the brain via a neuro-interface)

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

you can, as a program.

but if it's a theory, that's a different story.

I'm thinking of patenting the theory - I have a friend who lives near me and is a doctor of science)

Reason: