From theory to practice - page 860
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
If you like, also post a couple of deals with comments on why it happened this way and not that way. We will discuss. But not from the tester, but at least on the demo. OK?
No problem...
Well, actually there is a problem - my tester doesn't work :-) I have to do everything in demos and cents :-)
by the way CHF opened with a gap downwards :)
no problem...
Actually, I have problems - my tester doesn't work :-) I have to do everything in demos and cents :-)
by the way, CHF opened with a gap downwards:)
will be back in an hour ;)
It's from a lack of neurons of your own :-) Or laziness to train them...
Whoever said what, the future is in ML - scaffolding, neural networks, etc...
- Uncle Sasha, you have the wrong sandwich! You eat it with the sausage upwards, and you have to put the sausage down, so it tastes better... - Schrodinger's cat))
In general, those who say we should work with High/Low are right.
Firstly this way more interesting information about the process (and by the way to calculate the formula of dispersion, by type of gamma-distribution), secondly it is logical, as two opposing forces, etc.
I don't mind, do I?!
That's what the topic is for - a flight of fancy. If you show a couple of trades on the demo with the reason for the results, we'll discuss them and then go ahead and open the signal.
Where is the monitoring gone? What is the reason?
It's all pampering, Eugene.
In any case, after the New Year the monitoring will be turned off - the fools on this forum do not want to see or hear anything.
It's all pampering, Eugene.
In any case, monitoring will be disabled after the New Year - the fools on this forum don't want to see or hear anything at all.
If we are talking about pipsing, then 100%
It's all pampering, Eugene.
In any case, after New Year monitoring will be turned off - fools on this forum do not want to see or hear anything.
I wanted to ask - are the ticks now read evenly by time? Or as the necessary tick comes? If not evenly, do not you think that the price/time relationship is lost?
I wanted to ask - are the ticks now timed evenly? Or as the right tick comes in? If not evenly, don't you think the price/time relationship is lost?
:))) No, I will not describe the method of ticks reception - this moment was too difficult for me, and I am not sure in it till the end - after the New Year I will test it 2 months more, but in closed mode, without monitoring.
Otherwise, it will be totally uninteresting - then what will Asaulenka suffer in the evenings?
After all, the Grail must be a secret, and giving it away is the top of thoughtlessness, especially considering the astonishing stupidity and feeble-mindedness of most grail seekers on this forum.