Practice testing, reflection, discussion... - page 10
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The approach is wrong.
That's all there is to it.
Everything, IMHO!
I disagree... :-)
I disagree... :-)
There is no officiality. Even if only for observation - it is necessary!
For there are many peculiarities in the real world... :-) Double interpretation and everything else is not excluded... if you just keep a table...or whatever.
Otherwise, it would be all clear and no questions asked!
Make 2 cents accounts: direct, on your TS by MSA and reverse, as you wrote - "mirror". Dough for the start interested people in the experiment - pour, IMHO!
Otherwise it's rubbish.
Everything, IMHO.
P.S. And no need to prove anything to anyone :-)
P.P.S. ... when dEps of direct and inverse variants will fly away in space! :-)
There is no officiality. Even if only for observation - it is necessary!
For there are many peculiarities on the real... :-) Double interpretation and everything else is not excluded... if you just keep a table...or whatever.
Otherwise, it would be all clear and no questions asked!
Make 2 cents accounts: direct, on your TS by MSA and reverse, as you wrote - "mirror". The interested people in the experiment will fill up the dough for the start, IMHO!
Otherwise it's rubbish.
Everything, IMHO.
P.S. And no need to prove anything to anyone! :-)
P.P.S. ... when dEps of direct and inverse version will fly into space! :-)
I have enough money as it is.
I don't need new accounts for the stupid reason that I'm REALLY performing this experiment on EXISTING.
And no calculating person would be uncomfortable with the fact that the data is laid out on this thread, and not in the terminal window, if it's the ONE AND ONE DATA.
Respectfully ;-)
What's the point of me tweaking the result if:
- Firstly, I'm not proving anything to anyone here, I'm just checking the validity of your own claims for all to see;
- and secondly, I'm posting the signals FOREVER. And anyone can scribble a couple of numbers on a piece of paper, and then shove it in my face if he notices a fraud.
That's it...
which ones?
I have enough money as it is.
I don't need new accounts because I am REALLY performing this experiment on the existing one.
And no calculating person would be uncomfortable with the fact that the data is posted on this thread, and not in the terminal window, if it is the SINGLE DATA.
Respectfully ;-)
Draw whatever you want!
I don't give a fuck about any of this! :-)
Like in the fairy tale about three little pigs: "Nif-nif", "Nuf-nuf" and "Poh-nah"! :-)
PRACTICE ON REAL is the criterion! Double it or dump it - that would be the criterion. It will, indeed, be possible to observe and monitor there... and somehow - take an interest... I suggest that you organize a micro, but the real, and wishing to participate (me included), pour it for observation, at least 1000 rubles ... As many as you can...
10 000 rubles on the micro-real - this is 30 000 cents (it is possible that your approach may be a smaller amount ...) - You can already be courageous to let the Martins and the like on the MSF
Then - and then - and watch, and watch, and assess, and draw conclusions... What is the problem with organizing a trading account?
Otherwise - empty calculations and drawn figures! IMHO!
... about the three little pigs: "Nif-nif", "Nuf-nuf" and "Poh-nah"! :-)
which ones?
I'm interested in watching (and even participating in) whether there will be a GUARANTEED (as everyone here claims) SLIVE of a martingale-based trading system (and various questions along the way...).
Good idea with the public account, I am ready to support it)
Sure, what's the point of bullshit?
So what if the starter of the branch has enough money: "I have enough money."
That's not what I'm talking about!
I'm talking about the purity of experimentation and observation!
And PAMM account - for the convenience of pouring investors dough for the start of direct and inverse version of the TS on the MSF!
Not necessarily PAMM (although... we can get something from PAMM according to offer!!! :-)), we can have two normal micro-real trading accounts and that's all!
Sure, what's the point of bullshit?
So what if the starter of the branch has enough money: "I have enough money."
That's not what I'm talking about!
I'm talking about the purity of experimentation and observation!
And PAMM account - for the convenience of pouring investors dough for the start of direct and inverse version of the TS on the MSF!
Not necessarily PAMM (although... we could get something from PAMM according to offer!!! :-)), we can have two normal micro-reals and all!
You're so hot :-)
Probably - you do not have confidence that it will sell a martin guaranteed ;-)...