Practice testing, reflection, discussion... - page 3
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The PRNG is supposed to choose whether to buy or sell. You leave it up to the market: sell down or buy up.
With the second statement is also a problem: fifty-fifty will be only in general (in the limit, in an infinitely long area...), and in a particular case (in a limited area) no one rules out a series of ...over a dozen, ...tens or even ...ten losing trades in a row. This is what martingales usually burn on.
1) Have you not noticed - I have a SELL in both cases...
2) A series of ...tens of losing trades in a row is my dream :-) If I had an opportunity to meet such series OVER their statistical probability - I'd have more money now (anti-martin, shit...). Otherwise, it's 50/50. The "volume game" and trading the inevitable "departure of the price from the current level" - just feed me. And these series won't do me anything...
1. You yourself admit -until...
(2) And if you start a failsafe, you'll bite your fingernails off up to your elbows. )))
:-)
1. At the moment!
2. there Avalanches are firing and now in a flat - not pouring!!!! :-)
Starting entry criteria are close to near-shear, to formalize testing (like, if on M15 on EUR-bucks the candle is white, then go long, black - to sell!), because at MSCh - different report results, that is not acceptable for me.
Part of exposures and settings in the branch of "Selves"!
1. She is!
2. It is necessary for all if not an account, then some monitoring, otherwise there will be no trust, because it is not serious, because you can write anything, as they say - "Paper will endure"!
Von, Yusuf, (Oh! By the way, he's in a ban right now... - Probably posted links to his GRAALs' monitoring on the public domain again... :-)) in his branch "Sultonov Indicator ..." offered a table to fill in the trades using his entry/exit indicator ... Even if he filled it out and commented... there would still be no credibility... (I mean the approach, but not personal distrust...). I am now monitoring his TS on zulu and no questions asked! So far in profit! So here too, because the topic is interesting and needs some formality and a competent approach, not just some entries ... albeit in a table...
Man, all the trades will be listed here WITH LENGTH... look, count the numbers... and draw conclusions... What more is there to observe?
Shit, all the trades will be listed here WITH LENGTH... Look, count the numbers... and draw conclusions... What more is there to observe?
Yeah, I don't know! People won't believe it anyway... have to make excuses, prove something to someone, etc.....
This way, you'd see everything + no need to prove anything, just attach the report and that's it! In my opinion, it is necessary to start PAMM here...
Apart from joking, it would attract investors... IMHO!
Start a PAMM! Starting conditions are acceptable!
And for the sake of the case - on the Shary Enterprises take performance (series of transactions in profit) in profit, IMHO - PAMM appropriate!!!
on the sliff.
Your confidence in the sliff suggests that you have allocated a chunk of your resources to mirror the trades here :-) and expect to double that amount ;-)
Yeah, I don't know! People won't believe it anyway... We'll have to justify ourselves, prove something to someone, etc.....
And this way, everything would be immediately visible + no need to prove anything to anyone, attach the report and that's it! In idea, it should be a PAMM start ...
Apart from joking, it would attract investors .... IMHO!
Start a PAMM! The starting conditions are acceptable!
And for the sake of the case - on the Shary Enterprises take performance (series of transactions in profit) in profit, IMHO - PAMM appropriate!!!
No, dear, this thread - not for proof of whoever it was that I started it.
This is a PRACTICAL experiment that should allow us to see: either the possibility to make money "by playing in large amounts" in the market, where the result of checking any TS is "50/50" (minus spread); or a sinking/devaluation of the experiment with the conclusion as to "who" rules - martin or anti-martin.
No, dear, this thread - not for proof of anything I started.
Here is a PRACTICAL experiment where we should see: either the POSSIBILITY to make money "playing in volumes" in the market, where the result of testing any TS is "50/50" (minus the spread); or losing/destroying the amount allocated for the experiment with the conclusion of "WHO" rules - Martin, or anti-martin.
See for yourself...
But for completeness and clarity of the picture you don't need a separate account to trade on this TS for several instruments. Everything, IMHO.
1) Have you not noticed - my SELL stands in both cases...
2) A series of ...tens of losing trades in a row is my dream :-) If I had an opportunity to meet such series OVER their statistical probability - I'd have more money now (anti-martin, shit...). Otherwise, it's 50/50. The "volume game" and trading the inevitable "departure of the price from the current level" - just feed me. And these series will do me nothing...
2) Trading the inevitable "price departure from the current level" - interesting idea, can you share?
See for yourself...
But for the sake of completeness and clarity of the picture you NEED a separate account with trading on this TS on several instruments. Everything, IMHO.
Well - everyone who wants can do it for himself...
1) Yes, I probably just hadn't noticed. Nevertheless: then why the 30pp condition?
2) Trading the inevitable "departure of the price from the current level" - interesting idea, can you share?
1) 30 pips to stops is chosen arbitrarily to ensure discreteness of the process... and no more
2) Of all known to me trading signals I have found the ONLY one, which is performed with a probability of more than 50 per cent - "PRICE MUST LEAVE FROM CURRENT LEVEL". I've already screwed the necessary technical solutions onto it...