On-line trading advisor. Exchange of views - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
What do you mean by "stop that cuts off wrong entries"? I've already talked about methods of preventing a drain. A loco can only have a system-correct entry when it builds up uncontrollably.
When the trading system determines the priority direction or makes a forecast, you usually know at the movement of which value against the open position the system will change the signal or the received signal will be considered false. This is where the stop is placed.
The lock is identically equal to the difference of open positions' Sizes (accurate to swaps). If the Sizes are equal, there are no open positions, and do not be misled by the way the orders are registered in MT4. Your actual system is the rules for increasing/decreasing the open positions. If this is done on the basis of profit/loss of previously placed orders, then, imho, it is tantamount to the absence of a trading system and it is just a matter of time before you lose.
What are you talking about, where have you seen stops, takeaways at 10p? Are you fantasising on a freestyle theme or something? Look at the bottom line in the image, the tees are pretty decent:
When a trading system determines a priority direction or forecast, it is usually known when there is a movement of a certain amount against the open position, the system will change the signal or the received signal will be regarded as a false one. This is where the stop is placed.
The lock is identically equal to the difference of open positions' Sizes (accurate to swaps). If the Sizes are equal, there are no open positions, and do not be misled by the way the orders are registered in MT4. Your actual system is the rules for increasing/decreasing the open positions. If this is done on the basis of profit/loss of previously placed orders, then, imho, it is tantamount to the absence of a trading system and it is just a matter of time before you lose.
That's fine (no need to fiddle with options). What misconception? - Real orders are open on a real account (not knowing what to do with them does not mean (automatically) that they are unnecessary).
When you buy bread at the shop, did you open an order or close it ?
There is only buying or selling and NOTHING else. Everything else is for convenience.
When you bought bread at the shop, did you open an order or close one ?
There is only buying or selling and NOTHING else. Everything else is for convenience.
I agree and should be used for convenience, i.e. to increase profits.
You're welcome. Who's against it. Everyone is in favour. I just wonder how many years it will take you to understand that this way of accounting is not profitable.
You're welcome. Who's against it? Everybody's for it. I just wonder how many years it takes you to understand that the way of accounting, profit cannot bring.
When a trading system determines a priority direction or forecast, it is usually known when there is a movement of a certain amount against the open position, the system will change the signal or the received signal will be regarded as a false one. This is where the stop is placed.
The lock is identically equal to the difference of open positions' Sizes (accurate to swaps). If the Sizes are equal, there are no open positions, and do not be misled by the way the orders are registered in MT4. Your actual system is the rules for increasing/decreasing the open positions. If this is done on the basis of profit/loss of previously placed orders, then, imho, it is tantamount to the absence of a trading system and it is just a matter of time before you lose.
The stop is placed at the same place where the take (in terms of lot size) of the opposite order is placed. Thus, a stop triggering means that a take order is also triggered. Their sum adds up to a profit. There is no "profit/loss of the orders placed earlier". The system works according to the principle: a larger profit order triggered, and after it, after 1 pip of price movement, a smaller loss order triggers. The other forms and types of triggering are connected with different types of protection against account loss.
You mean that locke is not a TC no of course not a TC(an auxiliary tool - for preservation and multiplication!)
After graduation, we got together about five years later. We shared our experiences. One of our guys ended up at the car repair plant. He told us how he was fired from his job as a fitter )))))))))))). To repair wheelsets you need bearings and a certain material for the axles. According to the specifications. They do not have such at the moment, and the plan is on fire. This was back in the days of the Soviet Union. The chief engineer gives him a task - calculate whether you can do with the material that is available? Calculation - the answer - no, because safety margins are not complied with or you have to make such diameters that the connecting dimensions are not observed, then the bearings do not pass. After he voiced the verdict of the chief, we laughed for a long time, and he said he was not that outraged: "What have you counted for me - you can not.... This is nonsense. Count it up so that it is possible ! ..... ".
It's the same for you..... Preservation and multiplication do not depend on the method of accounting..... How many times have we counted: well, the lock does not give any advantages. Use it if you like - it is your business, but when you talk about benefits and advantages, you are misleading yourself and others.
However, that's enough of that.