On-line trading advisor. Exchange of views - page 6
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Roman, as soon as I set the EA on an account less than 50% of the optimal balance, it will simply tell me: "Account size is not sufficient..." I do not determine the optimal balance manually or by input parameters, it is calculated based on the distance (frequency of touching a certain range) between "lots". The distance determines the actual "stop" within which and when an EA opens an order with the maximum lot, it should not close at a margin call. In short, the maximum number of lots is calculated and the optimal balance is determined based on this. You cannot trade $5, $50, $500 or $5000 equally effectively just by changing the number of "blocks". And to open one account with $1600 and expect that it will be profitable, if suddenly this pair will begin a long flat of the size of "distance" - is the top of recklessness. I've been through this before, when I bet money on one currency. Sadness came: after a few months, but it came :)
I see. In that case, it is necessary to optimize the trading system for a real approach (start) (not excluded, that with significant changes of logic of those or those its components - the main thing is to remain in the same theme (canvas) - if it is impossible - register somewhere on Zulutrade, they, like, and with demo accounts of trading signals providers accept... or put it aside for the time being, watch other TS-kits), but not on paper, like someone was Mixon777 - traded volumes of 1000 lots on a demo ... I think this is all nonsense.
Connect it to Sberbank (might be enough for the first time)
I see. In that case, it is necessary to optimize the trading system for a real approach (start) (not excluded that with significant changes in the logic of those or other components - the main thing is to remain in the same topic (canvas) - if impossible - register somewhere on Zulutrade, there, like a demo account providers trading signals accept ... or put it aside for the time being, watch other TS-kits), but not on paper, like someone was Mixon777 - traded volumes of 1000 lots on a demo ... I would have thought it would have been better.
It won't work, I've learned the trade from similar services. One disconnection from them or me (non-synchronous) and new orders will be set (by them) in the wrong way and will trigger in the wrong way. Then you are responsible for what you did not do. Everything is recalculated and modified, and everything is OK. You can even shut down for half a day without too much trouble.
What about the option of optimising the trading system for a real approach?
I am simply describing the conditions, rules and capabilities of my EA. Of course, under all market conditions and trading conditions only miracle gaalis work, which I am still a long way from because I am not so pompous as to burst with pride in my stats.
The corridor is 100 pips and you don't need so many lots and the depo will need to be smaller. (10pp noise, even market vibration is impossible to trade, and a 15pp candle within 1-2 seconds is normal and nothing will open).
What about the option of optimising the trading system for a real approach?
Patient: Doctor, can I have lard?
Doctor, looking at the test results: What lard ?????????
Patient: Well, maybe in the future?
Doctor weary: In what future ???????
My point is: What kind of trading system? Where do you see it? The presence of a loc tells us only one thing: there is no idea for a statistically significant trading advantage. Otherwise there would be a stop that would cut off false entries. At the same time an error in forecasting would be seen, if the system is a predictor, or an error in determining the prevailing direction, if the system follows the market. Otherwise it is just a matter of time. And the author must have guessed it - that is why there are many reasons (who wants - looking for an opportunity, who does not want - looking for a reason): it all comes down to an understandable desire to risk other people's money ;) although explicitly it has not been said yet. IMHO, of course.
Patient: Doctor, can I have lard?
Doctor, looking at the test results: What lard ?????????
Patient: Well, maybe in the future?
Doctor weary: In what future ???????
My point is: What kind of trading system? Where do you see it? The presence of a loc tells us only one thing: there is no idea for a statistically significant trading advantage. Otherwise there would be a stop that would cut off false entries. At the same time an error in forecasting would be seen, if the system is a predictor, or an error in determining the prevailing direction, if the system follows the market. Otherwise it is just a matter of time. And the author must have guessed it - that is why there are many reasons (who wants - looking for an opportunity, who does not want - looking for a reason): it all comes down to an understandable desire to risk other people's money ;) although explicitly it has not been said yet. IMHO, of course.
:-))) In that case... "...Or put it aside for now, for the time being, to look at other TCs" ...waiting for a Miracle in the form of 50-60 thousand baka chips... :-))) Then light it up, so light it up!!! Of course, it would be nice to see the author's opinion...
:-))) In that case... "...Or put it aside for now, for the time being, to look at other TCs" ...waiting for a Miracle in the form of 50-60k baka chips... :-))) Then light it up, so light it up!!! It would be nice to see the author's opinion, of course...
The corridor is 100 pips and you don't need so many lots and the deposit will need to be smaller. (10 pips is noise, even the vibration of the market is impossible to trade, and a 15 pips candlestick in 1-2 seconds is normal and nothing will open).
What are you talking about? Where have you seen 10 pips stops, takeovers? Are you fantasising on a free theme or what? Look at the bottom line in the image, the tees are pretty decent:
What's my point: what trading system? Where did you see it there? The presence of a lock shows only one thing: there is no idea that allows to obtain statistically significant trading advantages. Otherwise there would be a stop that would cut off false entries. At the same time an error in forecasting would be seen, if the system is a predictor, or an error in determining the prevailing direction, if the system follows the market. Otherwise, it's just a matter of time before the system fails.
What do you mean by "a stop that cuts off the wrong entries"? I already spoke about methods to prevent losses. The loc can have the wrong entry only when it is building up uncontrollably. The system is not built on the entry of the first order of the block by a certain signal, but it has its limitations.
What about the option of optimizing the trading system for the real approach?
You could remove the protection by reducing the entry balance to any size. At the end of last year it worked like that. If you want to see how it works in such a mode, I will set up the Expert Advisor. But the advantages are only that you can go in with less money. The EA itself works less efficiently.
You could remove the protection by reducing the input balance to whatever size you wanted. At the end of last year it worked that way. If you'd like to see it work that way, I'll set up an EA. But the advantages are only that you can go in with less money. The EA itself works less efficiently.