Counter positions: self-deception or subtle tool? - page 14
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
What is the nonsense? It's as simple as that - the proof always forgets to point out that with locks you can make profit from two possible paths, but with netting you can only make one.
I remember, I remember. :)
In all seriousness, for actual performance there can be an insignificant difference in one direction or the other. These are the realities of performance at different times, but that's not what we were talking about. As it is, there is no difference - it has been checked hundreds of times/calculated. There is an inconvenience if strategies have been designed without taking into account the possibility of joint work, but no more than that.
Good luck.
Man, I'm sick of it (giving you an example):
without a loc:
1. opened SELL 1.0500
2. Price went sideways: closed SELL 1.0600 => 100 p loss.
3. opened BUY 1.0600
4. Price went wrong again (to 1.0400), but we overshot
5. Waited for 1.0700 and happily, wiping sweat from foreheads and sighing, closed the BUY => 100 pip profit.
7. Total profit = 0 p.
with a lock (ideally):
1. opened SELL 1.0500
2. Price went sideways: opened counter BUY 1.0600
3. Price has got to 1.0400 with a clear indication of further upside moves: close SELL => take a 100 p profit
4. Price has reached 1.0700 with signs of a slowdown: close BUY => 100p profit
5. Total profit from our movements 200 points
Conclusion: 200 points > 0 points (NO COMMENTS )
not a postulate... it's simple... do 20 trades on any strategy... either with or without lock....
What does NETTING have to do with it? - The way the Balance is displayed How does it affect the results?????
the length of this netting path is equal to the sum of the lengths of the first and second, in points you get the same
Man, I'm sick of it (giving you an example):
without a loc:
1. opened SELL 1.0500
2. Price went sideways: closed SELL 1.0600 => 100 p loss.
3. opened BUY 1.0600
4. Price went wrong again (to 1.0400), but we overshot
5. Waited for 1.0700 and happily, wiping sweat from foreheads and sighing, closed the BUY => 100 pip profit.
7. Total profit = 0 p.
with a lock (ideally):
1. opened SELL 1.0500
2. Price went sideways: opened counter BUY 1.0600
3. Price has got to 1.0400 with a clear indication of further upside moves: close SELL => take a 100 p profit
4. Price has reached 1.0700 with signs of a slowdown: close BUY => 100p profit
5. Total profit from our movements 200 points
Conclusion: 200 points > 0 points (NO COMMENTS)
Aleksander:
What does NETTING have to do with it? - The way the balance is displayed How does it affect the results?????
Netting is not a way of displaying balance, but a strategy.
Netting is not a way of displaying the balance, but a strategy.
don't be stupid....
Nettingis part of clearing, a process whereby a client's monetary claims are set off against their monetary obligations. Netting results in a net balance - a position - for each client.
Man, I'm sick of it (giving you an example):
without a loc:
1. opened SELL 1.0500
2. Price went sideways: closed SELL 1.0600 => 100 p loss.
3. opened BUY 1.0600
4. Price went wrong again (to 1.0400), but we overshot
5. Waited for 1.0700 and happily, wiping sweat from foreheads and sighing, closed the BUY => 100 pip profit.
7. Total profit = 0 p.
with a lock (ideally):
1. opened SELL 1.0500
2. Price went sideways: opened counter BUY 1.0600
3. Price has got to 1.0400 with a clear indication of further upside moves: close SELL => take a 100 p profit
4. Price has reached 1.0700 with a clear sign of slowing down: close BUY => 100 p. profit
5. Total profit from our movements 200 points
Conclusion: 200 points > 0 points (NO COMMENTS)
The locaƟon to netting is not correctly converted