Counter positions: self-deception or subtle tool? - page 17

New comment
 
Andrei01:
Already quoted the example 3 times. Read the thread.

Apart from general phrases and erroneous reasoning about summing up the lengths of segments there is nothing - where is the specificity?

And this.

 

Для доказательства нужно сначала ознакомится с аксиомами геометрии, 
например что через две точки можно провести только одну прямую, 
соединяющую их кратчайшим растоянием - это значит что все остальные прямые 
проходящие через две данные точки будут иметь отрезки большие по сумме. 
Отсюда даже школьник сможет сделать простой вывод что более длинный путь между 
двумя точками всегда имеет большее растояние (в данном случае прибыль). :)
Пысы: если хотите доказать недостатки неттинга то это нужно делать не так.

That's a masterpiece. As a connoisseur of geometry axioms can you tell me - how many lines can be passed through two points? Since the reference was to a school course, I assume it was Euclid's geometry ?

Regarding the attacks on loci - can you read? Yes use it - there is a discussion of a single postulate:

lock offers no advantage other than psychology and for any lock strategy you can build an equivalent netting.

ALL !!!!!!!

Good luck.

 
Mischek:

So I asked you to show in the picture from page 11 where the locker will press "Close the counter". The locker will never press it, he's the locker

If he (the locker) has his hand up, he should close the counter at the bottom at 1.2856, where the red line is horizontal.


 
Mischek:

Explain why you can't do it?
Because with locks there are two different paths and with netting there is only one of them. Obviously you can't combine them as the profit from the second path will be lost.
 
Aleksander:
in whose favour? :)


count the positions with 0.1 lot

lock 7 poses

netting 9 positions.

 
goldtrader:

If he (the locker) has his hand up, he should close the counter down at the price level of 1.2856 where the red line is horizontal.




Sasha there is turquoise long, red short, and the dashed one is their counterpart in the netting

In your example there is no lock, the long was closed at the top, and the short was opened there as well

 

The locker, actually, when the price reaches 1.2890 - must reopen a Sell position, and at the red line close all positions with Plus...

otherwise what kind of a locker is it... press the buttons without making any loco trades...

 
Andrei01:
Because with locks there are two different paths and with netting there is only one of them. Obviously these cannot be combined as the profit from the second path would be lost.
It has been repeatedly written that it is not about combining, but about a different way of accounting, which does not affect the FINANCIAL result in any way.
 
Andrei01:
Because with locks there are two different paths, and with netting there is only one of them.

Don't insult your own intelligence. Any way you go, you lose money. Whether it's netting or petting.

 
VladislavVG:

lock offers no advantage other than psychology and an equivalent netting can be built for any lock strategy.

ALL !!!!!!!

Good luck.

But who said that the netting will be different between locked and non-lock strategies?

I wonder why it is so hard to understand such a simple thing.

 
goldtrader:
It has been repeatedly written that this is not a merger, but a different way of accounting, which does not affect the FINANCIAL result in any way.

It does. Just the pseudo-easy way - shot - (lost) - and forgotten - for some reason seems more scientific to people than just opened - and fucked up. Like, better luck next time.
1...101112131415161718192021222324...29
New comment