You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
In principle, it's not a bad idea. Although wrong, it should work. But you have to have the courage to admit your mistakes and the real problems with this methodology.
You should be able to see mistakes to start with, so that you can admit them later))
Mistakes must first be seen to be acknowledged))
You just have to look not only at the figures, but also at what other indicators are showing at the same time.
Forte's fogging it up again. The man doesn't want to share, he insinuates that he has to give. Just another grail seller pushing his advertisement in a veiled way.
Who told you I was advertising?
You just have to look not only at the figures, but also at what other indicators are showing at the same time.
Who can tell me if a candlestick order can work if High candlestick is 3 pips less than the opening price of the order?
Are bid and ask not confused with a 3 point spread?
Who told you I was advertising?
How else do you understand vague allusions? No information, no explanations, just "correct" predictions and advertising claims.
So it's impossible, he's a future tense builder.
Well, here we are getting to the time machine))))
In principle, it's not a bad idea. Although wrong, it should work. But you have to have the courage to admit your mistakes and the real problems with this methodology.
That's why I'm sorting it out and trying to understand in which cases it works and in which cases it misses, but it's hard to do without a tool...
And now for the best part - counting the profits)))