AMD or Intel as well as the memory brand - page 51
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I am posting my table with the new data from HideYourRichess. The criterion remains the same - ff. four2one, your speciality is the time*price criterion.
Conditionally, both configurations could be classified as blue by colour :) But still waiting for more optimizations, HideYourRichess.
joo
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (2000 MHz), cache 2x512 KB L2
DDR2 PC-5360 2GB
82.07*2(?)=164.14
310*2=620
Mathemat
Core 2 Duo E7200@2.53, cache 3 MB L2
4GB RAM PC-6400
46.27*2.53=117.06
213*2.53=538.89
Svinozavr
Celeron 900 @ 2.20 GHz, cache 1 MB L2
DDR2 PC-6400 2GB
52.18*2.2=114.8
206*2.2=453.2
benik
Celeron 325 @ 2.53 GHz, cache 256 K L2
DDR2 PC-6400 1GB
103.3*2.53=261.35
438*2.53=1108.14
begemot61
Pentium 4 670 @ 3.8 GHz, cache 2 MB L2
DDR2 PC-4266 2GB
78.57*3.8=298.57
169*3.8=642.2
BLACK_BOX
Athlon 64 X2 4200+ @ 2.2 GHz, cache 2x512 KB L2
DDR1 PC-3200 (?) 3 GB
77.84*2.2=171.25
forex-k
Core 2 Duo Q8200 @ 2.33 GHz, cache 2x2 MB L2
RAM 4 GB PC-6400
46.84*2.33=109.14
189*2.33=440.37
Phenom II X3 720 @ 3.72 GHz, cache 3x512 KB L2 + 6 MB L3
113*3.72=420.36
four2one
Athlon 64 X2 5050e @ 2.6 GHz, cache 2x512 KB L2
RAM 4 (8) GB PC-5970
60*2.6=156.0
134*2.6=348.4
begemot61
6-Core Opteron 2439 SE @ 2.8 GHz, cache 6x512 KB L2 + 6 MB L3
DDR2 4 GB PC-5333
42.33*2.8=118.52
95*2.8=266
begemot61
Xeon W5590 @ 3.47 GHz, cache 4x256 KB L2 + 8 MB L3
DDR3 PC-10670 12GB
27,53*3,47=95.53
62*3.47=215.14
Dmido
Pentium 4 @ 3 GHz, cache 512 KB L2
DDR1 PC-3200 1.15 GB
64.49*3=193.47
315*3 = 945
TorBar
Intel Celeron 331 @ 2.66 GHz, cache 256 KB L2
DDR1 (PC-3200) 1.5GB
105.49*2.66=280.60
386*2.66=1026.76
imp120
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ @ 2 GHz, cache 2x512 KB L2
DDR1(?) PC-3200 2 GB
90*2.0=180
318*2.0=636
Docent
Core 2 Duo E6550 @ 3 GHz, cache 4 MB L2
DDR2 PC-6864 2 GB
40.35*3.0=121.05
174*3.0=522
imp120
Mobile Core 2 Duo P8600 @ 2.4 GHz, cache 3 MB L2
DDR2 4GB PC-6400
44.99*2.4=107.98
201*2.4=482.4
Vinin
Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.00 GHz, cache 6 MB L2
DDR2 4GB PC-6400
36.99*3.0=110.97
152*3.0=456
should probably write "Mobile Core 2 Duo T9800 @ 2.93 GHz, cache 6 MB L2
how do you measure optimisation? on which page was it discussed.
how to measure optimisation? on which page it was discussed.
AMD or Intel as well as the memory brand
penultimate post there...
Result for Celeron 1.8
01:04:33
And this is the result for mt5 on the "new" script:
2009.09.28 20:17:41 AMD vs Intel_v2 (EURUSD,M30) Total Rating - 384.33827585630462009.09.28 20:17:41 AMD vs Intel_v2 (EURUSD,M30) №2 Double= 232558 operations/milli c
2009.09.28 20:16:48 AMD vs Intel_v2 (EURUSD,M30) №1 Int= 227272 operations/milli c
Expert and settings from page 20
Mobile Core 2 Duo T9800 @ 2.93 GHz, cache 6 MB L2 - 2:41 or 161 sec
Xeon 5355 @ 2.66 GHz, cache 2x4 MB L2 - 3:08 or 188 sec
Atom N270 @ 1.6 GHz, cache 512 KB L2 - I will tell you tomorrow
By the way, the ratio of time for scripts on these two machines is almost exactly the same as the ratio of EA time.
On a heavy computational task, initially multi-processor.
How much memory this task needs is the main question. If it needs 20-25GB, the difference is catastrophic. If it's comparable to the amount of memory in a laptop, it's quite bearable.
Yes, also, more (I think) suitable for performance testing EA and its settings are on page 50 of my post.
kombat, check too please, as there will be at least 4-5 results - I'll put together a table.
P.S. Maybe we should open a new thread in which there will be a single measurement methodology and results using it. Because here already a whole "zoo" accumulated.
On that task, if set up to 20-25G any brand dies at all. :) No, I'm lying, the silicones are still fluttering.
In that case, the amount of memory on that machine is excessive and simply overpaid for it.
kombat, please check too, as soon as I have at least 4-5 results - I will put them in a table.
P.S. Maybe we should open a new thread in which there will be the only methodology of measurement and results using it. Because here already a whole "zoo" has accumulated.
Ok, I'm up and running...
On my celeron the calculated time shows 02:47:42 (approximately, for it fluctuates during the passes)
Yes! not specified, that's why the gen.opt bird is off.
ZS: so what's the problem? ;)
New optimisation on opening prices 707c.
But the topic is about hardware selection, not about tests? I think it would be a bit strange to build a computer on 775 and am2 sockets as computer is not only CPU frequency and RAM size but also technologies. For example I replaced my last atlon 1200 because it didn't have SSE3 technology, but if 4 years ago I haven't built the dual core, now I would have probably used core 2 duo. Investing "extra" $200-300 into hardware now will save us a lot of running around the shops later. It's time for me to build a new computer too, but I am now waiting for a new tester and 32 nm hardware.
Basically, this thread is about everything to do with processor and memory.
If any computer* in any configuration is good for trading, then for some moments of testing the situation is different.
It is clear that both AMD and Intel essentially make the same, however not everything is so unequivocal, and in the same "price of issue".
---------------------------
*not any, forget the third stump and some AMD. Case in point.