AMD or Intel as well as the memory brand - page 55

 
Mathemat >>:
Belford, этот тест - на частоте 2.8, а не 3.72?!

Phenom II X3 720 @ 2.8 GHz

))) 3 is 3(three) cores. 720 is the number part of the name of the stone.

 
Svinozavr >> :

Phenom II X3 720 @ 2.8 GHz

))) 3 is 3(three) cores. 720 is the number part of the name of the stone.

Well it's a BE, so whether he overclocked it for the test or not, you have to ask the owner. Most likely not since he was asked to bring it down to its nominal speed about 30 posts ago

 
HideYourRichess >> :

Expert and settings from page 20


Mobile Core 2 Duo T9800 @ 2.93 GHz, cache 6 MB L2 - 2:41 or 161 sec

Xeon 5355 @ 2.66 GHz, cache 2x4 MB L2 - 3:08 or 188 sec

N270 Atom @ 1.6 GHz, cache 512 KB L2 - more info tomorrow




Mobile Core 2 Duo T9800 @ 2.93 GHz, cache 6 MB L2 - 2:41 or 161 sec 161*2.93 = 472

Xeon 5355 @ 2.66 GHz, cache 2x4 MB L2 - 3:08 or 188 sec 188*2.66 = 500

Mobile Atom N270 @ 1.6 GHz, cache 512 KB L2 - 12:54 or 774 sec 774*1.6 = 1238


overclocked Atom

Expert - Mobile Atom N270 @ 2.0 GHz, cache 512 KB L2 - 10:06 or 606 sec 606*2.0 = 1212

script - 126 sec - 126*2.0 = 252


table here https://forum.mql4.com/ru/25722/page49
 
Mathemat >> :
Belford, this test is at 2.8, not 3.72?!

Yes, at a nominal frequency of 2.8 GHz.

 

And this is an overclocked 3.72 GHz:


 
Svinozavr писал(а) >>

While it's difficult - optimisation is underway. As soon as possible. (I hope you don't suspect me of sabotage? ))))

No, I don't :)

Your commentary read, but willing to do all you describe will be little I'm afraid. That is why I took the path that, if possible, removes the sources of errors in measurements, but forces the user to perform a minimum of actions.

2 Belford: perhaps I searched badly, could you tell me on which page you placed screenshots of CPU-Z? I am interested in the tabs with CPU and memory information in overclocked mode. If you didn't have them, please give them to me.

 

Only the CPU multiplier has been increased.

 
Belford >> :

Yes, at a nominal frequency of 2.8 GHz.

Yeah, well, I'm a bit of a dummy. From the first optimization you can see that your configuration was a bit stronger than the blue Core 2 Duo group. And it's stronger now too.

2 HideYourRichess: I did what I could. There are three configurations.

 

Belford, thank you.

Eh, where are the results of the former "troublemakers"...

The ones we have now fit into a coherent system. It lacks mystery :)

 

Well, no, there are still mysteries - say, in four2one's optimization results.

Or in Atom's unexpectedly high (for such a stone) results (the results are not so catastrophically worse than Pentium 4 @ 3 GHz, cache 512 KB L2 from Dmido! ).

Or, say, in the fact that kombat's Pentium Dual CPU E2180 turned out to be so frisky on the script.

Reason: