AMD or Intel as well as the memory brand - page 47
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Just a laptop.
Just a laptop.
I don't care if it's a mainframe. Where are the screenshots of the configuration?
Added.
I'm going to test an Atom-powered netbook tomorrow.
I think netbooks are the most promising topic for the future.
Added.
I'll test the netbook on the Atom tomorrow.
I think the most promising topic, for the future, are netbooks.
For trading for sure. Not for optimization/testing. If there will actually be support for more than 1 core, then... Eh! Opterons rule!!!
Also, an old desktop, 8 cores, two 4-core processors.
The laptop's better than that.
For trading, absolutely. Not for optimisation/testing. If there will actually be support for more than 1 core, then... Eh! Opterons rule!!!
Why do Opterons rule?
Also, an old desktop, 8 cores, two 4-core processors.
The notebook will be better.
Notebook is better because of its frequency, bigger cache and faster memory, and only in this particular test :)
Why Opterons rule?
Number of cores/price.
For trading, absolutely. Not for optimisation/testing. If there will actually be support for more than 1 core, then... Eh! Opterons rule!!!
If there will be multi-threading support - then Core i7 rules unequivocally. There is a comparison on the net between Intel's Nehalem architecture server 4 cores and Opteron 6 cores. At least Intel is not inferior.
The comparison was carried out for server tasks, i.e. where multithreading is currently the best implemented.
Besides, Intel's 6-core is just around the corner.
The notebook is better because of the frequency, larger cache and faster memory, and only on this particular test :)
It was also seven times cheaper, in terms of money.