AMD or Intel as well as the memory brand - page 76

New comment
 

Here's another test of the second script from DC2008 (Core i7 965 EE):

 
Alexei! This is not a monitor test! ))) We're talking about rocks...
 

Er... I agree, even on my 22", the pictures are too big. Well... the author posted thumbnail pictures in his personal account, which are only properly visible when enlarged. I'm just posting the cropped ones.

 

Come on...

Six more comments and they'll crawl away on their own.

 
It's hard to make out what time it is in the screenshots ?
 

Changed the pictures. Hopefully, it's all visible now and the monitor isn't being abused.

 
Nickname Processor Memory EA Result
HideYorRichess Atom N270 @ 1.596 GHz, L2 512 KB DDR2-532 2 GB (4-4-4-12) 1ch 1880 * 1.596 = 3000
kombat Celeron 430 @1.795GHz L2 512KB DDR2-665 2 GB (5-5-5-15) 1ch 1049 * 1.795 = 1883
Svinozavr Celeron 900 @2.2GHz L2 1MB DDR2-800 2 GB (5-5-5-18) 1ch 581 * 2.2 = 1278
begemot61 Pentium 4 670@3.8GHz L2 2MB DDR2-533 2 GB (4-4-4-12) 1ch
Docent Core 2 Duo E6550 @3.003 GHz L2 4 MB DDR2-859 2 GB (5-5-5-15) 2ch 418 * 3.003 = 1255
HideYourRichess Xeon X5355 @2.66 GHz L2 4 MB FB-DDR2-665 32 GB (?-?-?) ?ch 465 * 2.66 = 1237
Mathemat Core 2 Duo E7200 @2.534 GHz L2 3 MB DDR2-800 4 GB (4-4-4-12) 2 ch 481 * 2.534 = 1219
Vinin Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.006 GHz, L2 6 MB DDR2-801 4 GB (5-5-5-18) 2ch 394 * 3.006 = 1184
HideYorRichess Mobile Core 2 Duo T9800 @ 2.926 GHz, L2 6 MB DDR3-1064 8 GB (7-7-7-20) 2ch 392 * 2.926 = 1147
YuraZ Core i7-920 @ 2.66 GHz, L2 4x256 KB + L3 8MB DDR3-1066 12 GB (?-?-?-?) 3ch(?) 369 * 2.66 = 982
DC2008 Core i7 Extreme 965 @ 3.20 GHz, L2 4x256 KB + L3 8MB DDR3-1067 6 GB (7-7-7-16) 3ch 295 * 3.2 = 944
begemot61 Xeon W5590 @ 3.33 GHz, L2 4x256 KB + L3 8MB DDR3-1334 12 GB (9-9-9-24) 3ch 263 * 3.33= 876
YuraZ Core i7-920 @ 3.8 GHz, L2 4x256 KB + L3 8MB DDR3-1143 12 GB (?-?-?-?) 3ch(?) 226 * 3.8 = 859
YuraZ Core i7-920 @ 4.0 GHz, L2 4x256 KB + L3 8MB DDR3-1203 12 GB (?-?-?-?) 3ch(?) 214 * 4 = 856
joo Athlon 64 X2 3800+ @ 2.01 GHz, L2 2x512 KB DDR2-670 2 GB (5-5-5-15) 2ch 753 * 2.01 = 1514
Imp120 Athlon 64 X2 3800+ @ 2 GHz, L2 2x512 KB DDR-400 2 GB (?-?-?-?) ?ch 707 * 2 = 1414
Belford Phenom II X3 720 BE @ 3.717 GHz, L2 3x512 KB + L3 6MB DDR3-1339 2 GB (9-9-9-24) 1ch 317 * 3.717 = 1178
begemot61 Opteron 2439 SE @ 2.8 GHz, L2 6x512 KB + L3 6MB DDR2-667 4 GB (5-5-5-15) 2ch 424 * 2.8 = 1187
Belford Phenom II X3 720 BE @ 2.813 GHz, L2 3x512 KB + L3 6MB DDR3-1339 2 GB (9-9-9-24) 1ch 374 * 2.813 = 1052
 

Here's another topic...

I've raised it before, the minimum possible, and in my mind "cold" set of PCs to create a "VPS at home".

Not even cold, but rather economical...

Agree, to eat 120 watts and 65 is equal to almost two times more work from the ops.

(I mean the real, total power consumption).


So, on the wave of my "seleronism" not without surprise, I read this:


Довёл я безмоторность до предела, купив эту плату:

http://europe.asrock.com/mb/overview.ru.asp?Model=A780GXH/128M

...

Следующий этап, видимо, холодный 45Вт Феном х3 6ГБ кэша. Если, конечно, такие вообще будут. Небось, не раньше лета 2010.

and not because of AMD, but because sleron also tdp=45, but without a fan there is no way, though it has smothered it slightly... a little bit...

 
kombat >> :

Here's another topic...

More precisely brought it up already, the minimum possible, and in my mind "cold" set of MS to create a "wpc at home".

I don't know what VPS is for, but Asus EEE PC 901 (with SSD disk) is almost silent and doesn't heat up. In idle mode (WinXP) with display switched off it consumes about 7 W (according to my measurements). Under load about 10-12 W. (True even a modem will "eat" electricity, but this is if access to the net is not through a network card). From APC RS-800 UPS works about 2 hours, and if you put 2 batteries at 12 V 9 ampere-hours each (consistently) + converter to 12 V, then all 15-20 hours. And there's also a native battery for 4-5 hours...

Anyway, now there is a good choice of motherboards in mini-ITX format and with more powerful processors (2-core Atom, etc.). For example http://www.ixbt.com/mainboard/intel/intel-d945gclf2.shtml

 

Особенности платы

The Intel D945GCLF2 is based on the very old and relatively hot 945GC chipset. This fact makes the board cheap, but imposes rather strong restrictions on its functionality. In addition, the high TDP of the north bridge - 22,2 W - forces the manufacturer to resort to active cooling. The fan is on the chipset, not on the processor, as one might initially think. The presence of a noise source can be recognized as a significant disadvantage when it comes to a compact PC of low power.

not impressive...

1...697071727374757677787980818283...94
New comment
Reason: