Paper "AMERO" will replace the dollar by spring!? - page 40

 
sab1uk >> :

I don't give a shit what he's trying to analyse with his stupid brain.

He's got it all figured out... he reads all kinds of pelevins, enjoys all kinds of Nemtsov reports (he'd rather read John Perkins on global corruption)

everyone knows that nemtsov-like freaks get "grants" in washington.

Timbo praises the USA and its "values" and I asked why Iraq was destroyed, you did not get an answer.

It is clear to all reasonable people that the U.S. is a fascist state in its sophisticated modern version.

I do not dispute, in Nazi Germany most individual people were good, but the system they lived under was their opposite

No one needs to explain what the goals of such a state may be.

The U.S. disfigured Yugoslavia under false pretexts, there is a whole list of what they were really after, starting with the copper industry...

they set fire to the Reichstag, the twins, and they crippled Iraq to gain access to oil and contracts to rebuild the country

Afghanistan was taken to produce drugs, Kosovo was a transshipment base for distribution in Europe

babbling about "democracy" and asking idiotic questions - why do they dislike the USA so much?

Who sympathises with tymba automatically gets a grade...


Probably such "sensible people" and supported Lord Parvus' scam to create a revolutionary situation in Russia in 1917 ;). By the way, there were two fascist states (one of them was called a socialist state, but the name doesn't change the essence of the policy) in the prewar world (before WWII): Germany and the USSR - both called for unity against the common enemy - the first on the basis of class, the second was smarter and called for unity on the basis of nation. If you are rich today you can become poor tomorrow, today's proletarian can become a bourgeois, even theoretically, a peasant can become a fist and so on, but if you are a Jew, you will never become a German.....

As to the USA - IMHO - they didn't give a damn about everything - they saw two sources of danger for the country and made them fight... Then everything went on by inertia. It is the same now - their security and their country's interests are more important to them. Is that not a statesmanlike approach? Or didn't Stalin try to push Germany and England together in his time? What were the Americans doing in Iraq? What were Soviet troops doing in Afghanistan? Finland? And who "bombed" Poland and Germany? And Russian troops in Georgia? In Sevastopol in May ( even before August ;) ) the Russian fleet was preparing to enter the Caucasus to blockade the Georgian coastline - only the lazy knew about it in Sevastopol... or do you think that a ship from scratch could be prepared to leave in a couple of weeks? ;).... So, if you do not like the U.S. policy towards other nations (I do not like it either), then to be fair you should pay attention to your own country's policy.

A huge plus for the states - note that there were protests in the states against the state policy in Vietnam... and in the uSSr over afghanistan ? that's it.... don't say a word about Ukraine at all.....

Here is another link for those who like to look at the economic situation one-sidedly ;)...

http://ru.rpl.net.ua/2009/02/26/rossii_predskazano_umeret.html

Good luck.

 
Galaxy писал(а) >>

Since when did you become free of propaganda if you only read clones of Russian-language websites.

Timbo, unlike many, at least tries to analyse and express his thoughts. Anyone who has seen Google can poke around with links.

Propaganda hooks many people one way or another, but those who think for themselves are the least dependent on it. Here I agree with you.

Unfortunately I have not heard Timbo's own thoughts, only what is written on American news sites. The value of that is as low as publications on Vesti.ru. Personally, I only look at bare facts on such sites, and then necessarily with confirmation from other sources. Interpretations of these facts by different parties are often directly opposite.

And analysts, too, are a real problem. It only makes sense to look at the opinions of critical people. Everyone criticizes from their own bell towers and as a result you can get a less voluminous picture.

Khazin and Golubovsky are examples of such analysts here. As for the USA, I usually go to http://www.kitco.com/. In the Contributed Commentaries section there (especially in the lower half) you can find very intelligent people and very unbiased articles.

So anyone who doesn't want to be a victim of propaganda won't be one.

 


25 March


1. US President Barack Obama, without saying anything fundamentally new, nevertheless managed to boost the US dollar on the international foreign exchange market. Gullible investors believed in assurances of the head of the state that American currency is now stronger than ever.

2. MMM depositors were no less convinced that the paper of that pyramid scheme was "stronger than ever".

3. The passengers on the Titanic were also convinced they were sailing on the most unsinkable ship at the time.


In all these cases, the suckers have been simply brainwashed, for example, newspapers wrote that Titanic was the top of the engineering, that all cutting-edge ideas of that time were implemented in it, and that there was nothing that could sink it. But when such a touted leaky boat sank, it became clear that there are not enough boats for everybody.


The earth is full of suckers.

 
sab1uk >> :

Ukraine is in a pre-default state and the orange proles continue to play cat-and-mouse with Gazprom

But she will play a game ...

Read less political literature ;). And Tymoshenko has her own approach - she defends Ukraine's interests, in this case they do not coincide with Russia's - but do they have to?

http://www.bagnet.org/news/summaries/ukraine/2009-03-25/11353

>> Good luck.

 
sab1uk >> :

Should the opinion of an analyst such as yourself be taken into account?

What did you say last year about Ukraine's situation? You said they were going to be fine...

Ukraine is in a pre-default state and the orange bastard keeps playing cat and mouse with Gazprom

and they're gonna play cat and mouse with Gazprom.

Well, if his prediction had come true, you wouldn't have even mentioned it. You're now unknowingly defending YOUR opinion again, and actually sympathising with Timbo.

 
VladislavVG >> :


blah blah blah

Wake up uncle, the USSR no longer exists and the 17th revolution was sponsored by who knows who...

When was the last time you were in Russia or the USSR, and have you ever been?

Our people have always despised the Communist Party and condemned their losses in Afghanistan

Another victim of the Western media about Georgia... I would kick your ass for South Ossetia.

 
FOXXXi >> :

Well, if his prediction had come true, you wouldn't have even mentioned it. You're now unknowingly defending YOUR opinion again, and actually sympathising with timbo. Oh, how could it be, because such a guru was wrong.

>> don't make me laugh.

 
sab1uk >> :


Another victim of the Western media about Georgia... for South Ossetia I'd kick your knuckles in.

Can I give you an address? Will you come? I was in the SAS when you were a foot soldier, and I had a few assholes like you in my platoon. The question is whether you lived in the USSR, boy, or whether you just watched movies about it. Because it looks like you've only heard about the Communist Party. Were you even a candidate for membership? Ticket number, if you were.... because you're a master whistleblower..... And as for the kamppole - come and see if it's as easy for you as it is for you to talk.

 
timbo >> :

The first to reject the idea on behalf of the Russian government was Kudrin, who publicly made Medvedev look like a complete fool with the idea of a new currency.

The second would be China, which is the least interested in the idea. The US has dollar-denominated debt, and China has savings. If the dollar deflates, the US debt will disappear and China's savings will disappear, by the way both of them have the biggest savings in the world. Who would benefit?

China has been working hard for years to prevent its currency from strengthening. If the dollar disappears, the yuan will become a real strong currency. At the same time, the competitiveness of European and American manufacturers would rise sharply and the competitiveness of Chinese manufacturers would fall. Who will buy Chinese goods when European goods are half the price? China will lose its markets, and it will become like any other, a normal country, no 10-15% GDP growth for several years in a row, no economic superpower, it will be like Belarus, only bigger.

Hands off Belarus!

 
VladislavVG >> :

You should read less political literature.

And we don't read it. We are Chukchi writers, not readers. At best, we can share a link to a political book.


В. Pozdner said he was told by an American TV station before he was kicked out: "In the US, freedom of speech is on the street, not on TV stations. We will not allow the truth about our advertisers to be publicly reported." After these admonitions, Vovochka was grabbed by the scruff of the neck by huge uncles and thrown out into the street, to spread freedom of speech. And what country is this Yankee of origin now? Can you guess three times?

Reason: