Market theory - page 279
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Yeah, thanks. Observing. And this is based on Yusuf's indicator?
0. I have been watching Yusuf's games for a long time, and I will say this: Yusuf feels the right way, but cannot articulate it.
1.He is bogged down in (what he thinks are) the "physics" of the market. All these ideas about who buys what, what profits will be made when demand changes, elasticities, and so on are all hollow.
2. Just like a zoo of leopards and other crocodiles.
3. The problem statement needs to be more general. We need new knowledge in DSP (digital signal processing), namely synthesis of a digital filter, with better than known characteristics. With less lag and more smoothing. Ideally (considered impossible by most people, but there is no strict proof of impossibility for nonlinear algorithms) - non-lag filter (by a word filter I mean reduction of the sum of first difference modules on an arbitrary time interval).
4. At the same time it should be pure mathematics. Regardless of whether it is the market, terrain, sound, temperature fluctuations, or what. The physical nature of the signal is not important. The only thing that matters is the mathematics: smoothing with minimal (almost zero) lag.
5. Accordingly, when Yusuf starts playing games with hyperbola equations, it is already a mistake. His thoughts on the relationship between demand, supply, prices are hollow. The algorithm should "know" nothing about demand, prices, and so on, it should bluntly filter the signal - be it a coordinate of Yusuf himself (to which leopards are inapplicable).
6. Incorrect bases of Yusuf's ideas lead to the fact that his digital filters (probably good in general - I won't belabor the point) constantly have singularities, when values get lost in the middle of nowhere. Which makes analysis qualitatively difficult.
7. Yusuf - drop your zoo. Drop the wrong premise of "trade" analysis. Put the problem in general terms - implementation of signal filtering of any nature. Where there are no buyers and sellers.
Solve this problem - get everything.
0. Partly, I agree, or rather, I have not yet managed, for Forex, to formulate it, but I think about this problem, I need like-minded people. For the real market everything is clearly articulated;
1. Not ready to give up this view of the essence of the market;
0. Partly, I agree, or rather, I have not yet been able, for Forex, to articulate it, but I am thinking about this problem, needing like-minded people. For the real market, everything is clearly articulated;
1. Not ready to give up this view of the essence of the market;
1. Not ready to give up this view of the essence of the market;
Hence, naturally: https://www.mql5.com/ru/signals/154780
Another loser of deposits.
Demo or real, it's all a bust.
Theory's good - lots of words.
Practice - zero.
I have been watching Yusuf's games for a long time, and I will say this: Yusuf feels the true path, but cannot articulate it.
He is bogged down in (what he thinks are) the "physics" of the market. All these ideas about who buys what, what profits will be made when demand changes, elasticities, and so on, are all empty.
Just like a zoo of leopards and other crocodiles.
The problem statement needs to be more general. We need new knowledge in DSP (digital signal processing), namely, synthesis of a digital filter, with better than known characteristics. With less lag and more smoothing. Ideally (considered impossible by most people, but there is no strict evidence of impossibility for nonlinear algorithms) - non-lag filter (by a word filter I mean a reduction of the sum of first difference modules on an arbitrary time interval).
That said, it should be pure mathematics. Regardless of whether it is the market, terrain, sound, temperature fluctuations, or what. The physical nature of the signal is not important. The only mathematics that matter is the smoothing with minimal (almost zero) lag.
Accordingly, when Yusuf starts playing games with hyperbola equations, it is already a mistake. His thoughts on the relationship between supply, demand and prices are hollow. The algorithm should "know" nothing about demand, prices, and so on, it should bluntly filter the signal - be it a coordinate of Yusuf himself (for which leopards are inapplicable).
Incorrect basis of Yusuf's ideas leads to the fact that his digital filters (probably good in general - I won't belabor the point) constantly have singularities, when values get lost in the middle of nowhere. Which makes analysis qualitatively difficult.
Yusuf - drop your zoo. Drop the wrong premise of "trade" analysis. Put the problem in general terms - implementation of signal filtering of any nature. Where there are no buyers and sellers.
Solve this problem - get everything.
I recommend Yusuf a good book:
http://raspletin.com/nots/organizatsija-nauchno-tehnicheskih-konferentsij-i-publikatsij/publikatsii
DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING IN MULTIFUNCTION RADARS. METHODS. ALGORITHMS. APPARATURE. Collective monograph / Edited by G.V. Zaitsev. - Moscow: Radiotekhnika Publisher, 2015. - 376 с. - ISBN 978-5-93108-108-3.
The monograph was prepared by a team of authors directly related to the design of digital signal processing systems for multifunctional radar complexes. The book describes the principles of designing digital signal processing devices, time-frequency processing algorithms, hardware design methods, specific developed devices, and performance evaluation methods.
The purpose of the monograph is, on the one hand, to present the results of the conducted work to scientific public and, on the other hand, to serve as a training aid for young specialists. It is no secret that a generation gap has occurred in the Russian military-industrial complex, and this book aims to help young professionals bridge the gap. The book is intended for scientists and engineers working in the field of radiolocation and radio communications, and it can also be useful for undergraduate and graduate students in related fields.
I have been watching Yusuf's games for a long time, and I will say this: Yusuf feels the true path, but cannot articulate it.
He is bogged down in (what he thinks are) the "physics" of the market. All these ideas about who buys what, what profits will be made when demand changes, elasticities, and so on, are all empty.
Just like a zoo of leopards and other crocodiles.
The problem statement needs to be more general. We need new knowledge in DSP (digital signal processing), namely, synthesis of a digital filter, with better than known characteristics. With less lag and more smoothing. Ideally (considered impossible by most people, but there is no strict evidence of impossibility for nonlinear algorithms) - non-lag filter (by a word filter I mean a reduction of the sum of first difference modules on an arbitrary time interval).
That said, it should be pure mathematics. Regardless of whether it is the market, terrain, sound, temperature fluctuations, or what. The physical nature of the signal is not important. The only mathematics that matter is the smoothing with minimal (almost zero) lag.
Accordingly, when Yusuf starts playing games with hyperbola equations, it is already a mistake. His thoughts on the relationship between supply, demand and prices are hollow. The algorithm should "know" nothing about demand, prices, and so on, it should bluntly filter the signal - be it a coordinate of Yusuf himself (for which leopards are inapplicable).
Incorrect basis of Yusuf's ideas leads to the fact that his digital filters (probably good in general - I won't belabor the point) constantly have singularities, when values get lost in the middle of nowhere. Which makes analysis qualitatively difficult.
Yusuf - drop your zoo. Drop the wrong premise of "trade" analysis. Put the problem in general terms - implementation of signal filtering of any nature. Where there are no buyers and sellers.
Solve this problem - get everything.
Wow! What a message! What a categorical advice! What is the basis for such confidence in what is being said?
Or is it "I'm a drain, but I know how to make money"? ****
6% for the year at 10% risk is a terrible result. Sharpe 0.1 !!!!!!
==================================
Where the hell did that come from? Where does???? come up with so much unfounded confidence in people? It's been bugging me.
Must be the vodka. I'm gonna go get drunk as a pig.
No offence.