You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I don't believe it.
Cute. It's even more interesting now. )
I understand that it's not that simple. ) I was going to rewrite my scheme too, but left it for now. I am waiting for the article. It will be the most interesting article for me. )
"Do you see a gopher? - And I don't see one, but I do!"
I have a prettier one, and with more meaning.
just what's the point bro, to PR that you use "reliable virtualization technology".
there is no such thing. self-deception of yourself and others.
The issue of reliability is one of the most important.
Well, that's my point...
The system was designed to create asymmetry
I'll have a prettier, more meaningful one.
but what's the point, bro, of you using "reliable virtualization technology".
there's no such thing. self-deception of yourself and others.
Well, everyone loves their child more, that's understandable:) Although I'll admit, the panel's pretty cute, too.
I don't want to argue about reliability. It seems to me that it is quite reliable, and I am writing about it. Further, the way will show - battle test will show everything:)
so what's my point...
I don't get it. Why does a trader need asymmetry?Why? )
Yes, there will be a lot of interesting stuff there: peculiarities of asynchronous mode, multithreaded interaction of experts, global and local loops, features of exchange pricing and trading on FORTS, event model and graph theory, dynamic identification of types and building a flexible application, etc. etc.
Cool. It's a big one. It's going to be a big article. )
Cool. It's a big one. It's going to be a big article. )
Yes, there will be a lot of interesting stuff there: peculiarities of asynchronous mode, multithreaded interaction of experts, global and local loops, features of exchange pricing and FORTS trading, event model and graph theory, dynamic identification of types and building flexible application, etc. etc.
Well, that's what I'm saying, no asymmetry, it's reliable.
no.
You see, all this reliability will disappear when, on the first fill, not the specified lot passes, but only a third of it, and the rest is removed.
That's all. The CCA of the "order" is illiquid.