Is martin so bad? Or do you have to know how to cook it? - page 19
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
After being denounced, what's there to hide? )) Tried to hide it before when you wrote that you "stumbled across the video by accident". ))
I can draw tits in paint.
.... I take it that's the most you can do.
Writing zigzags is for beginners))
Yeah, that's my ceiling )
Where can you see it from? ) my floor is your ceiling.
Like the Expert....a arranged a "Bazaar"))
....I don't see anything strange about that.
What exactly is obvious to you?
Here are some methods of artistic equity design.
1) Head-on:
The method is as simple as a bagel, its essence is to calculate ideal inputs/outputs for a specific history, for example using ZZ, or by reversals of double SMA shifted back by a period. We get an array of 2 columns, entries/exits and time. This is the solver function defined in the table. To make realistic, you can add a little time delay or damage the ideal picture in some other way. It is the basis for trading.
2) On the forehead:
Well here the option space explodes. I'm talking about overfitting neural networks.
3)By the cheek:
Same as 2) but in this case we overfit a multi-parameter TS with history, brute force, stochasticity, genetics, etc.
This is probably what the esteemed Expert meant by "draw". But I am sure he has more than a dozen other ways.
Such bots are refined by forward testing on an unknown (to the bot) part of history or synthetic quotes to find out their logics, prognosis and MM.
In general, the tester's equity curve by itself is not a proof. The only way is to perform a demo version of the bot in person. Everything else can be easily falsified without the demo. We can even use a graphics editor to draw equity and everything else.
Here are some methods of artistic equity design.
1) Head-on:
The method is as simple as a bagel, its essence is to calculate ideal inputs/outputs for a specific history, for example using ZZ, or by reversals of double SMA shifted back by a period. We get an array of 2 columns, entries/exits and time. This is the solver function defined in the table. To make realistic, you can add a little time delay or damage the ideal picture in some other way. It is the basis for trading.
2) On the forehead:
Well here the option space explodes. I'm talking about overfitting neural networks.
3) Cheek:
Same as 2) but in this case we overfit a multi-parametric TS with history, brute force, stochasticity, genetics, etc.
This is probably what the esteemed Expert meant by "draw". But I am sure he has about a dozen other ways.
Such bots are debunked by forward testing on an unknown(to the bot) section of history or synthetic quotes to find out its general logic, forecasting and MM.
Thank you for the information.
I have a degree in Mathematical Methods in Economics and Mathematical Modelling of Economic Processes.
How's that going? Has genetics helped, any mutations in the Guru?
Thank you for the information.
I have a degree in mathematical methods in economics and mathematical modelling of economic processes.
How's that going? Did genetics help, any mutations in the Guru?
I have a degree in Intelligent Systems and Networks.
I suggest you don't embarrass yourself any further. I think if you did not lie about your HE, you clearly understood what I wrote in the previous post)))
Give me a demo, if you are not afraid of finally earning a "hand-face".