Errors, bugs, questions - page 2774

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Server and code for playback.
The discovery server is real.
Code in private.
Is it possible to broadcast signals from Metatrade 4 Finam forex as a seller on your platform? I have created a Super profit signal but for some reason I cannot subscribe to it. Please help me with this issue, in the forum where you are sending from
Who says you can't? Anything is possible. Please, next time you have a subscription question, let the SIGNATOR ask the question.
I sent it to the PM.
Dug in.
The yellow ones are the time beaten. Red - time is longer than the next tick. There must be more bugs. Didn't dig any further.
Dug in.
Yellow - the time is beaten. Red - time is longer than the next tick. There must be more bugs. Haven't dug any further.
Yes, we should go back to an earlier version. Otherwise, the number of "spherical horses" is growing.
To combat "spherical horses" you need "spherical nicotine" in drops )))
Is there still a restriction on the same product naming under MT4 and MT5 in the marketplace?
The situation is absurd. MQ is gradually closing MT4, but in order to port a product from MT4 to MT5 you have to attach an obvious suffix like "MT5" to its name or otherwise have to "confuse" the established name somehow. Why? Products are identified by a number anyway. Any author should be able to publish the same product on all platforms, including future ones (if there are MT6/7...). When MT4 is completely gone, there will be all the products left with the meaningless saying "MT5".
similarly in kodobase with cross-platform codes
Is there still a restriction on the same product naming under MT4 and MT5 in the marketplace?
The situation is absurd. MQ is gradually closing MT4, but in order to port a product from MT4 to MT5 you have to attach an obvious suffix like "MT5" to its name or otherwise have to "confuse" the established name somehow. Why? Products are identified by a number anyway. Any author should be able to publish the same product on all platforms, including future ones (if there are MT6/7...). When MT4 is completely gone, there will be all the products left with the meaningless "MT5" prefix.
Clients manage to buy Expert Advisors labeled MT5 for MetaTrader 4 and vice versa. Then they are surprised and ask to cancel their purchase and replace it with the right product.
So it's not that simple.
Clients manage to buy EAs prefixed with MT5 for MetaTrader 4 and vice versa. Then they are surprised and ask to cancel the purchase and let them replace it with the right product.
The idea is to merge two products into one with the same name, so that the right file is downloaded for the right platform.
This is so obvious that it makes one wonder why it is necessary to explain.