Errors, bugs, questions - page 1087
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The abbreviated notation of the postfix operator++ does not compile when an explicit conversion of a base class pointer to a derived
At least the compiler should warn that a.f() is not const
Thanks for the heads up, both errors have been corrected.
But in the templates. I'll give you examples later.
Here too - it's not clear.
everything works correctly, but if you add the intermediate function ex2(...)
The result is different. What did ex2(...) do ? - just passed the pointers by reference on
Please take a look at
Here too - it's not clear.
everything works correctly, but if you add the intermediate function ex2(...)
The result is different. What did ex2(...) do ? - just passed the pointers by reference on
Please take a look at
It's not the first time, but it's the only time you get such photos when uploading, which means you have to set some criteria (you probably have a certain size).
). They are displayed normally everywhere else. Please tell me what's wrong.
An unnecessary compilation error occurs if a macro uses a result type conversion, and the return value is not subsequently used (sometimes it is needed, sometimes not)
This has nothing to do with the use of defines.
A simple define equivalent will also give the same error
P.S. Now there will be a vorning here.
After recompiling the indicator, the "array out of range" error started to occur when working with dynamic arrays.
It didn't occur before. What to do?