Errors, bugs, questions - page 1983
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
From your broker. This question comes up every week...
And then how do you link the BROKER mt4 to your site? Is there an article or video?
A note for the future: http://orf.textologia.ru/definit/bezindikatorniy/?q=532&n=7113
A note for the future
Yes, thank you.
Colleagues, has anyone encountered attempts to implement STL c++ library (correcting for language capabilities)? Preferably with codobase placement, search says no, but vrdug . . Certainly not all, but some basic stuff: a few normal containers via templates, and that auto_ptr (I certainly wrote my own, but self-writing such primitives is silly).
I don't understand why std µl is non-template and why we had to invent new names for methods/classes analogues in STL.
According to some information from MQ, they are preparing something along these lines as part of their standard library. What exactly and how complete it is, I am not aware of. I found this out because I have been writing my own version for some time now. But in the light of this information suspended the case, I want to see what will be released officially.
It's spelled correctly. In Russian, Y is changed to Y after consonantal prefixes. For example, prefixes. So syndicatorless, oddly enough, is correct.
I have encountered such a glitch in MT5 as an indicator buffer remaining.
The situation is as follows: I write an indicator with 4 buffers, compile it, put it on a chart, think about it.
Then I decide to bypass two buffers and leave two buffers. I partially remove them, i.e. I do not fill them with data.
I look at the chart where the indicator has been applied and there is trash in the zeroed buffer (in one buffer at that) - change of TF and restart of the indicator do not help.
The indicator is launched on a separate chart without glitches, i.e. there is no rubbish.
Is it meant to be like this, or it is a bug after all?
I have encountered such a glitch in MT5 as an indicator buffer remaining.
The situation is as follows: I write an indicator with 4 buffers, compile it, put it on a chart, think about it.
Then I decide to bypass two buffers and leave one buffer. I partially remove it, i.e. I do not fill it with data.
I look at the chart where the indicator has been applied and there is trash in the zeroed buffer (in one buffer at that) - change of TF and restart of the indicator do not help.
The indicator is launched on a separate chart without glitches, i.e. there is no rubbish.
Is it meant to be like this, or it is a bug after all?
It was designed that way. The cleanness of the array and / or the indicator buffer is the concern of the programmer.
Yes, and it's funny how the calculation-deprived buffers have swapped the first one to become the second one...
That's how it's designed. The cleanliness of the array and/or indicator buffer is the programmer's concern.
Shouldn't the buffer disappear after the indicator disappears?
However, maybe the calculations need to be de-initialised in some way, but how?
My point is that since the calculations remain, running a different indicator, with the same buffer name, may produce an unpleasant result... I have to check this hypothesis, of course...