1200 subscribers!!! - page 62
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
As of today, the signals service looks like this:
That's a curious metaphor.
What does it mean? (for the clueless)
Your post is sincere and interesting.
There are no answers to the questions you raised, except two: "The world is not perfect" and "Not all that glitters is gold".
Aptly chosen aphorisms)))) My guess is that Forex is a 100% casino and the 5% of successful traders are ordinary lucky guys.)
But the more I get into this SCIENCE, where mathematics, psychology, and all that stuff are intertwined, I think that experienced traders, while working conservatively, can stably show even 5-10% yield per month on a $500 account while earning tens of thousands on subscribers. Isn't it so? What is the problem, please?
By the way, communication with subscribers plays a very important role in attracting clients to the signal.
TheNew York City Capital(so far the first one in the top) had roughly 1000 subscribers and 5000000 million dollars of subscribers' money, it's just that on the average there is 5000$ per one, probably not less than half of them make 500$, hence people connect also from 10000$ to even I don't know... A person who trusts a $50000 signal for example can't be a tree at all.
Mad March
... I think, that experienced traders, while working conservatively, can stably show 5-10% profitability per month on $500 account and at the same time earn thousands of subscribers. Isn't it so? What is the problem?
The answer is very simple, and it lies in the rating and the top.
For example, there is an account in the service of signals, which consistently gives more than 10% per month, the drawdown is 10-30% - for six months it has "increased" by only 90%.
Such a signal has no chance to get even in the top 5.
And look at your signal, to which you are subscribed, starting on ECN with $100, scalping the deposit, a gain of 4000%.
Or a former leader - start with 1 dollar in a cent account, deposit acceleration.
And so on and so forth, the scheme is very simple.
A trader, who cares about his own account, but not about subscribers, has no chance to be in TOP and get subscribers.
p.s. This is all my private opinion.
It's a curious metaphor.
What does it mean? (for the clueless)
This cat is a simian. Signed up for the signal and sleeps.
This cat is a simulant. He signed up for the signal and sleeps.
And I thought this cat was the supplier that opened the signal, started the owl and is asleep.
It's definitely not a supplier, since they don't sleep. Apparently you have no experience and see only one side of the coin.
This is definitely not a supplier, as they do not sleep. Apparently you have no experience and see only one side of the coin.
If you're talking about those who trade only manually, or those who cannot sleep because of the sense of responsibility, or the excitement of high profits.
Very seldom someone trades robot in signals. And this can be seen from the history of the signal.
When the signals show that the position is set manually or by an Expert Advisor, it will be obvious that almost no one trades using a robot.
But the problem is not this, but the fact that many subscribers ask a lot of silly questions.
For example, one of them wrote in the past in indignation: "Why is your signal sent so late?
Or someone wrote every day begging me to increase my profitability. Or someone writes that you are a cheat.
And imagine that every day new subscribers come.