1) try different MOs (e.g. in my competition wooden MOs didn't work at all, only functional MOs worked: SVM, neuronics, ruler).
2) do not submit all features in a pile, but look for the best subset of features, in practice up to 3-7 pieces can be used.
you can get 0.8 on 1000 features and 0.1 on 5 features.
I selected the features. On different amounts of data it selects different ones, plus the importance of different combinations floats. So everything is rubbish :)
I did recursive selection, it doesn't find it either.
The error does not fall on the shaft. As if there are no links in the dataset. But there should be :)
This is exactly the situation of desperation, when people start torturing kozul.
Maxim Dmitrievsky #: I selected the features. On different amounts of data it selects different ones, plus with different combinations the importance floats. So it's all rubbish :)
I did recursive selection, it doesn't find it either.
Try the rules from the wooden MO to pick the best ones, like I did a long time ago, remember?
I remember something like that. Let's see, closer to the weekend I'll be in for 24 hours again, I'll check a lot of things. Maybe I'll have an epiphany
Software for Complex Networks# Release Date NetworkX is a Python package for the creation, manipulation, and study of the structure, dynamics, and functions of complex networks. It provides: With NetworkX you can load and store networks in standard and nonstandard data formats, generate many types of random and classic networks, analyze network...
DAG - Topological Layout# This example combines the generator with to show how to visualize a DAG in topologically-sorted order. Total running time of the script: (0 minutes 0.107 seconds)
1) try different MOs (e.g. in my competition wooden MOs didn't work at all, only functional MOs worked: SVM, neuronics, ruler).
2) do not submit all features in a pile, but look for the best subset of features, in practice up to 3-7 pieces can be used.
you can get 0.8 on 1000 features and 0.1 on 5 features.
I selected the features. On different amounts of data it selects different ones, plus with different combinations the importance floats. So it's all rubbish :)
Try bootstrap
try bootstrap.
I've been picking out the signs.
Try the rules from the wooden MO to pick the best ones, like I did a long time ago, remember?
Try the rules from the wooden MO to pick the best ones, like I did a long time ago, remember?
The same features do not make sense to take from the ceiling, because there are specialised algorithms:
1. Frequent Subgraph Mining (Frequent Subgraph Mining):
These algorithms look for subgraphs that occur frequently in a set of graphs. Popular algorithms include:
- gSpan
- FSG (Frequent Subgraph Discovery)
- FFSM (Fast Frequent Subgraph Mining).
2. Graph Similarity Search (Graph Similarity Search):
These methods search for graphs that are similar to each other in a set. Various graph similarity measures are used such as:
- Editorial distance of graphs
- Maximum common subgraph isomorphic correspondence
- Nuclear methods for graphs
3- Anomaly Detection in graphs:
These algorithms look for unusual or anomalous structures in a set of graphs:
- Density based algorithms
- Random walk based methods
- Spectral methods
4. Classification and clustering of graphs:
These methods group similar graphs or classify them into given categories:
- Graph kernels
- Graph neural networks
- Spectral clustering of graphs
5. Motif detection in graphs:
These algorithms look for recurring structural patterns (motifs) in graphs:
- FANMOD
- NeMoFinder
- MODA
6. Analysis of graph evolution:
These methods study how graphs change over time:
- Algorithms for detecting changes in dynamic graphs
- Predicting graph evolution
Are these libraries real or are they the hallucinations of a bunch of hooligans?
They're real, I' ve used them
Prado uses them in their examples. I don't know about the others.
These are the graphs in his dataset
Only with the difference that they have two nodes X and Y and intermediate nodes