Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 2160 1...215321542155215621572158215921602161216221632164216521662167...3748 New comment Uladzimir Izerski 2020.11.22 10:12 #21591 Aleksey Vyazmikin: Thank you for the flattering assessment. You're a master at evading answers. So what do you want to suggest? All right, well. To prove something, you have to show something. I'll open a non-subscription signal on Monday. Then we will talk. [Deleted] 2020.11.22 10:14 #21592 Renat Akhtyamov: Just compare. No one's saying you're wrong. Change the inputs to your system and see the results. By the way, I'm interested in it too. the reality is you don't know what the noise is for your TS so by changing the filters, you're just changing the TS I suggest you to close this useless topic with digital signal processing, which is not suitable for financial markets from the word "at all". [Archive!] FOREX - Trends, Optimisation range change start for developer Renat Akhtyamov 2020.11.22 10:23 #21593 Maxim Dmitrievsky: the reality is that you don't know what the noise is for your TS so, changing the filters, you just change the TS I propose to close this useless topic with digital signal processing, which is not suitable for financial markets from the word "at all" does that sound convincing? admin's words: https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/101311/page2#comment_2962042 Помогите разобраться с Фурье 2006.10.05 www.mql5.com Попытался воспользоваться «Библиотекой функций быстрого преобразования Фурье FFT» ('Библиотека функций быстрого преобразования фурье FFT'), что-то... [Deleted] 2020.11.22 10:33 #21594 Renat Akhtyamov: Will that sound convincing? admin's words: https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/101311/page2#comment_2962042 no. But this sounds convincing. https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/101311/page8#comment_2962102 Помогите разобраться с Фурье 2006.12.20 www.mql5.com Попытался воспользоваться «Библиотекой функций быстрого преобразования Фурье FFT» ('Библиотека функций быстрого преобразования фурье FFT'), что-то... Renat Akhtyamov 2020.11.22 10:52 #21595 Maxim Dmitrievsky: No. Now that sounds convincing. https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/101311/page8#comment_2962102 OK The problem with the Fourier series decomposition is that the problem is solved head-on, i.e. with noise it must first be filtered out and only then decomposed then apply a coefficient to each frequency, or a predictor, as is customary here and then put it back together The result will be interesting Predicting the future with Spectrum derivative (or spectrum Calculation of the slope [Deleted] 2020.11.22 10:54 #21596 Actually, if anyone doesn't know, this is the EMA(exponential moving average) filter: . [Deleted] 2020.11.22 10:58 #21597 Renat Akhtyamov: OK The problem with the Fourier series decomposition is that the problem is solved head-on, i.e. with noise it must first be filtered and then decomposed then apply a coefficient to each frequency or a predictor, as is customary here and then put it back together the result will be interesting Yeah, welcome to machine learning. Renat Akhtyamov 2020.11.22 10:59 #21598 Maxim Dmitrievsky: Yeah, welcome to machine learning Maxim, MO is DSP (digital signal processing) So there is no point in arguing about it. [Deleted] 2020.11.22 11:00 #21599 Renat Akhtyamov: Maxim, the ME is the COC Don't be so ridiculous Aleksey Nikolayev 2020.11.22 11:04 #21600 Renat Akhtyamov: OK The problem with the Fourier series decomposition is that the problem is solved head-on, i.e. with noise it must first be filtered and then decomposed then apply a coefficient to each frequency or a predictor, as is customary here and then put it back together the result will be interesting. How much more can this amateur radio nonsense pestering((. It does not work for the market, has never worked and never will. 1...215321542155215621572158215921602161216221632164216521662167...3748 New comment
Thank you for the flattering assessment.
You're a master at evading answers.
So what do you want to suggest?
All right, well.
To prove something, you have to show something.
I'll open a non-subscription signal on Monday. Then we will talk.
Just compare.
No one's saying you're wrong.
Change the inputs to your system and see the results.
By the way, I'm interested in it too.
the reality is you don't know what the noise is for your TS
so by changing the filters, you're just changing the TS
I suggest you to close this useless topic with digital signal processing, which is not suitable for financial markets from the word "at all".
the reality is that you don't know what the noise is for your TS
so, changing the filters, you just change the TS
I propose to close this useless topic with digital signal processing, which is not suitable for financial markets from the word "at all"
does that sound convincing?
admin's words:
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/101311/page2#comment_2962042
Will that sound convincing?
admin's words:
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/101311/page2#comment_2962042
no. But this sounds convincing.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/101311/page8#comment_2962102No. Now that sounds convincing.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/101311/page8#comment_2962102OK
The problem with the Fourier series decomposition is that the problem is solved head-on, i.e. with noise
it must first be filtered out and only then decomposed
then apply a coefficient to each frequency, or a predictor, as is customary here
and then put it back together
The result will be interesting
Actually, if anyone doesn't know, this is the EMA(exponential moving average) filter:
.
OK
The problem with the Fourier series decomposition is that the problem is solved head-on, i.e. with noise
it must first be filtered and then decomposed
then apply a coefficient to each frequency or a predictor, as is customary here
and then put it back together
the result will be interesting
Yeah, welcome to machine learning.
Yeah, welcome to machine learning
Maxim, MO is DSP (digital signal processing)
So there is no point in arguing about it.
Maxim, the ME is the COC
Don't be so ridiculous
OK
The problem with the Fourier series decomposition is that the problem is solved head-on, i.e. with noise
it must first be filtered and then decomposed
then apply a coefficient to each frequency or a predictor, as is customary here
and then put it back together
the result will be interesting.
How much more can this amateur radio nonsense pestering((.
It does not work for the market, has never worked and never will.