Discussion of article "Tips for an Effective Product Presentation on the Market" - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Experts have a Download Demo button both on the site and in the terminal:
But for indicators in MT4 it turns out that they have not enabled downloading demo versions yet. We will do it as in MT5 in the next version.
wooh, finally a positive outcome of negotiations - now it is clear why there was some misunderstanding between each other.
Experts have a Download Demo button both on the website and in the terminal:
But for indicators in MT4 it turns out that they have not enabled downloading demo versions yet. We will do like in MT5 in the next version.
Your position is surprising.
Try with such an idea (I won't pay, as I just temporarily held a full-fledged product in my hands, without any guarantees or control of the personal licence issued) to knock to software sellers and justify to them that it is only for development.
Fortunately, we have an opportunity of unlimited testing of demo versions of any products, which you can race in the tester and create derivative solutions.
This is just a normal position for a situation when demo versions (for MT4) cannot be tested. If there is a possibility to test demos, including MT4, then there are no questions.
However, the phrase "I will not pay because I just temporarily held a full-fledged product in my hands" (ends here) is still absolutely correct! Why should a custom developer pay for a product that he needs only to fulfil an order? And software vendors have nothing to do with it. I in no way suggested circumventing their rights. The second part of the phrase "and without any warranty or control of the personal licence granted" is from the ceiling. The problem was that MK does not provide such control.
I assume you mean next version of MT4 (not MT5).
Just a normal position for a situation when demo versions (for MT4) cannot be tested. If there is an opportunity to test demos, including MT4, then there are no questions.
"When preparing screenshots of charts, it is recommended to use the standard colour scheme "Black and White" (black colours on a white background). This scheme is the most compatible with the design of the storefront and will not irritate the customer's eye with a non-standard set of colours."
1. Is it recommended or is it still required? If still recommended, it means that it is not required!
2. On what basis were conclusions drawn that the dark background irritates the buyer's eye? Was a survey conducted or was the decision made unilaterally as usual?
Please tell me, which of the screens is more annoying, the dark one - on which everything is well and clearly visible or the light one - on which almost nothing can be seen!!!?
And most users still use the dark scheme! Isn't that right? There used to be screenshots of all users available and as far as I remember, when viewing them, most of them had dark colours!
Isn't that better for perception as it has more contrast!?