Discussion of article "Extract profit down to the last pip" - page 9
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
There is a monitor attached to the article. Since the publication of the article, the TC has been run on it and has never been stopped or changed, including input parameters. The goal is an honest objective experiment.
I have been doing a bit of research over the past time, a new Tester came out,.... revised some things. And even almost fell into what the article warns about: it is easy to throw a profitable TS into the trash.
I have no desire to write a sequel at all. So I decided to take "help from the audience". Is it a good practice to make changes to a TS that has been locked to the article? The situation is somewhat non-standard, so I am interested in an outside opinion.
There is a monitor attached to the article. Since the publication of the article, the TC has been run on it and has never been stopped or changed, including input parameters.
maybe I'm looking in the wrong place, but I think monitoring is switched off already, I used to see the results of TC work here https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/author/fxsaber.
Now it's"No records".
where to look?
I have no desire to write a sequel at all. So I decided to take "help from the audience". Is it a good practice to make changes to the TC locked to the article? The situation is somewhat non-standard, so I am interested in an outside opinion.
You have not described a specific TC (no TC is attached), but the approach in general. Of course you can change anything :)
I'm curious to know, if it was launched in September, what would be the train of thought? Wait or knock it out
maybe I'm not looking there, but in my opinion monitoring is already disabled, I used to see the results of the work of the TS here https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/author/fxsaber
now there are " No entries "
where to look then?
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/611810
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/611810
OK. Thank you!
found it, here's the whole monitoring of this TC https://www.mql5.com/ru/blogs/post/729193
Maybe I'm looking in the wrong place.
This is an interesting case, as the link is in the second sentence of the article.
I'm curious to know if it had been launched in September, what would have been the train of thought? Wait or knock it out
Can't answer that question unequivocally.
fxsaber:
Is it a good practice to make changes to the TC locked to the article? The situation is somewhat non-standard, so I am interested in an outside opinion.
Considering that you are probably the first one who directly confirms a trading article with a signal, I think you can do whatever you want.
Moreover, there are no eternal TS implementations.
The show must go onThere is a monitor attached to the article. Since the publication of the article, the TC has been run on it and has never been stopped or changed, including input parameters. The goal is an honest objective experiment.
I have been doing a bit of research over the past time, a new Tester came out,.... revised some things. And even almost fell into what the article warns about: it is easy to throw a profitable TS into the bin.
I have no desire to write a sequel at all. So I decided to take "help from the audience". Is it a good practice to make changes to a TS that has been locked to the article? The situation is somewhat non-standard, so I am interested in an outside opinion.
Is it a good practice to make changes to the TC locked to the article? The situation is somewhat non-standard, so I am interested in an outside opinion.
I am using an English translation, so I hope my point is not lost in translation.
First of all, I think it deserves respect to put a real monitor signal with the article. Most market sellers don't even bother about the signal, not even a demo.
This said. If with the vehicle change you mean change the logic, I would consider it cheating. Change the money management, no problem, as it only affects the outcome, not the logic.
So what exactly, what do you want to change to the vehicle?