Discussion of article "Extract profit down to the last pip" - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Was it Alpari by any chance?
With the average trade on the verge of cost, the reason is more about spread variations or slippages. But not the switching off of the pattern.
How do you deal with such outliers in real trading? They can wipe out your entire deposit in one fell swoop.
Why do you think the average trade is so small? Although visually we can see that the system takes almost all reversals well.
What the system lacks in your opinion? Would you like to discuss it?
p.s. elementary bollinger gives better results.
Was it, by any chance, in A-- was it?
Limiters are bad there, so no.
With the average deal on the edge of costs, the reason is more about spread variations or slippages. But not to turn off the pattern.
The switch off was observed without activation of costs.
How do you deal with such outliers in real trading? They can wipe out the entire deposit in one fell swoop.
You can use a stop or something else - it doesn't matter. The article removes it because it introduces distortions when searching for patterns.
It's like calculating the average deviation in a series where everything is smooth. Or then where momentum is added. It is clear that after that the mean will not characterise the bulk of the series in any way.
Why do you think the average deal is so small? Although visually we can see that the system takes almost all reversals well.
I do not think that the TS takes something well. Honestly, I did not choose the moment for the screenshot. It was the last full-fledged trading interval in a single run, that's why I got it.
What do you think the system lacks? Would you like to discuss it?
The article is not about this TS at all. I'm sorry if only a useless TS can be seen. You were right not to publicise it. Otherwise you could have thrown out 90% of the article.
p.s. elementary bollinger I have a better result.
Most likely, it is. It is better, of course, to give details.
In the article everything was done honestly. Not optimally, but honestly. And this particular stupid TC from the article was honestly put into monitoring. Perhaps it was done in vain.
The following points are worth considering:
1. The article analyses indicative quotes of the best stack prices.
According to these quotes are executed. Positive slippage of limit orders repels tens of per cent of commission.
I also analyse the limit orders' rejects. The order so far.
I have read your analysis on brokers. Unfortunately, I found it erroneous.
What is the sense in the chain of cause-and-effect phenomena leading to the result, to analyse the consequences themselves? No sense.
It would make sense, provided the independent nature of tick processes, but in reality the cause of ticks in external factors thatcannot be driven into the tester.
The maximum that can be squeezed out of this theory in the tester is a certain average constant leading in most cases to a certain gain, but the problem will be that the loss will not be defined, and then the drain.
What is the sense in the chain of cause-and-effect phenomena leading to the result, to analyse the consequences themselves? No sense.
It would make sense, provided the independent nature of tick processes, but in reality the cause of ticks is in external factors, which cannot be put into the tester.
The maximum that can be squeezed out of this theory in the tester is a certain average constant leading in most cases to a certain gain, but the problem will be that the loss will be undefined, and then the drain.
Fxsaber is a doc in codes. In reality, he has not earned a single dollar yet. He is digging into these ticks for some reason, messing with people's heads. There is only one strategy: buy at the minimum and sell at the maximum.
Are you ready to bet money on those words? I'll bet you 10,000 euros. You seem to earn much more than this "theorist", it must be a small amount for you.
I claim that the author of the article has withdrawn profits from my company many times more than he made. If you agree to argue, I'm ready to prove it (if the author doesn't mind).