Discussion of article "Extract profit down to the last pip" - page 20
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
OK, thanks, I'll have something to compare it to.
maybe I can't get away from my idea about finding a big Z-account, but I'm generating TCs, I've achieved a great speed in the optimiser )))) - in general I may be wrong, but the fact that I have optimised 2019.01.01 - 2019.04.01 with a large Z-account ?
then up to the current day passes the test without draining.....
in general there is not much information, on analysing the stats, mostly, what I do, some fantasies ?
without MO, the screen above OHLC M1 optil, time is less, on ticks the result of optimisation will be different, you can optimise on ticks, but if 4 months of optimisation is 15 minutes on OHLC, then on ticks 4.5 hours - here you need to read the author's materials, there were examples of how to thin ticks.
The average trade decreased in October (total +5503 pips of profit on 821 positions)
fxsaber:
From these figures it is well evident how much the commission(-4.35 pips) was covered by limit orders alone.
In September, slippages fully covered the commission.
and in October, it turns out, they do not cover it anymore.
do these pips include slips?
Yes.
What matters in this story is that even graality leads to plums.
Yes.
broker did not change commissions, swaps did not change, spreads did not change.
the supplier simply reduced the amount of slippages.
try the "sectarian" broker you mentioned). through an affiliate link, with a commission of 5.
Maybe they have everything normal with this case.
or maybe it can be that the amount of slippages here depends on the size of the deposit.
while trading with $200 - there was one amount of slippages.
started trading with the amount of $800 - there is a completely different amount of slippages.
The profit curve (without slippages) also goes well.
broker did not change commissions, swaps did not change, spreads did not change.
the supplier simply reduced the amount of slippages.
try the "sectarian" broker you mentioned). through an affiliate link, with a commission of 5.
Maybe they have everything normal with this case.
or it can be that the amount of slippage here depends on the size of the deposit.
while trading with $200 - there was one amount of slippage.
started trading with $800 - a completely different amount of slippage.
You are looking for conspiracies where there are none. The initial settings of the TS are drained for objective reasons - the market.
The account cannot be not drained unless it is disconnected. Otherwise there would be a precedent that an article was written with a grail that you run and forget. It doesn't work that way. The drain has dragged on, to put it mildly. Which is frustrating.
You are looking for conspiracies where there are none. Initial TS settings are draining for objective reasons - the market.
The account cannot be not drained unless it is disabled. Otherwise there would be a precedent that an article was written with a grail, which was launched and forgotten. It doesn't work that way. The drain has dragged on, to put it mildly. Which is frustrating.
saber, what do you think?
In the trailer are full reports after a single run of this script.