Discussion of article "Extract profit down to the last pip" - page 32
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
so what's the point of trading like this?
Are you being forced to trade?
Forcing or restricting freedoms is always illegal in all countries.
I think that nobody is forcing you, and nobody is restricting the topikstarter, if it is so, then there is no problem.
or rather the problem is in you, you count, several times already, other people's money, I do not give advice, but they say that it is better to count your own money, and once you count it, take it to the bank at interest.
on the subject - public monitoring, I didn't want to write, but since it's here.
balance chart is not clear, TC without drawdown is cool! But why such a peak at the end?
It looks as if the TS is reversed and trades exactly the opposite, it's not clear in general.
Thank you. It took a few days to replicate the result, even knowing the symbol and time. It was an interesting experience, something to think about.
I wanted to compare with MQ-ticks, I used this script, but after converting to futures, zero prices started to appear
What could be the problem?
I wanted to compare with MQ-ticks, I used open positions at the end of the pass are forcibly closed by the Tester market orders - by flipper. And if there is a zero there will be a "poker". In order not to have a poker, I prescribe flippers as the average value between bid and ask.
Most likely, KB does not have up-to-date versions of libraries, so the problem is present in them.
Most likely the KB does not have up-to-date versions of the libraries, so the problem is there.
Everything works correctly according to the ThirdPartyTicks.
Is the requirement for netting account and exchange execution still valid?
If yes, is it possible to test in Virtual (on hedge account and forex) instead?
If BestInterval is used in an Expert Advisor, is it tested in Virtual (VIRTUAL_TESTER flag is not used)?
Is BestInterval and OnTesterCustom compatible?Is the requirement for netting account and exchange execution still valid?
If it is necessary to accelerate through the tick filter or to disregard imaginary positive slippages, then sure.
If yes, can I test in Virtual (hedge account and forex) instead?
Yes.
If I connect BestInterval in the Expert Advisor, is testing done in Virtual (VIRTUAL_TESTER flag is not used)?
If you work with both libraries as libraries (not through a simple connection with macros), everything will work as you want.
Yes, they are.
At the very beginning of the article is a link to monitoring.
What's wrong with it, no more?
At the very beginning of the article is a link to monitoring.
What's wrong with it, no more?
Yes, it's better not to remember.
You wrote somewhere that if there is a pattern, it is pulled out by any system. Confirmation.
Perfect timing, I was just thinking of running it in the ns.
I thought, if we are fighting so hard to reduce cost, maybe it makes sense to buy and sell from different accounts. For eurusd buy from usd account and sell from eur. After all, before the transaction there is a conversion of the deposit currency into the quotation currency. When you sell, you get a purchase of usdeur. It is not a good example with eurusd, it is more relevant for crosses.
maybe it makes sense to buy and sell from different accounts.
Margin trading implies obligatory closing of open positions. So no.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/318657/page3#comment_12669838
It will be interesting to see what the tester will show in commission + slip mode