Experiments ... - page 73

 
PS: it supports the latest 7 types of RSI calculation and 22 types of prices
 
mladen:
PS: it supports the latest 7 types of RSI calculation and 22 types of prices

Dearest MLADEN

  I tried but it is impossible for me to handle in any style,it is too fast and strange results when experimenting,may be needs some other of your special treatment to it or may be some thing is missing because of unexpected behavior in results :) but all in all you knows better.

regards

 
mladen:

Made a trend normalized RSI based on the document attached here : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/186300

I recommend reading the document in order to learn how to use the indicator

Mladen you great!!! It can be MTF else? 
 
mntiwana:

Dearest MLADEN

  I tried but it is impossible for me to handle in any style,it is too fast and strange results when experimenting,may be needs some other of your special treatment to it or may be some thing is missing because of unexpected behavior in results :) but all in all you knows better.

regards

It is fast :)

Will see what else can be done

 
heispark:

Sir, do you have non-smoothed MTF version?  Your Ehlers Fisher transform 2.5.mq4 doesn't support MTF...

Or can I adjust some setting in this smoothed version to make it non-smoothed? 

Thanks, 

When price smoothing is set to <=1 it is "non-smoothed"
 
mladen:

Newer version of Ehlers fisher transform - the smoothed version (description can be found here : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/186064/page23 ) made multi time frame


Sir, do you have non-smoothed (interpolation supported) MTF version?  Your Ehlers Fisher transform 2.5.mq4 doesn't support MTF, other MTF version doesn't support interpolation...

Or can I adjust some setting in this smoothed version to make it non-smoothed? 

Thanks, 

 
mladen:
When price smoothing is set to <=1 it is "non-smoothed"

Thank you for your quick reply!

Even if I set price smoothing to zero, they still have some minor discrepancy: 

Why is this?

Thanks, 

 
heispark:

Thank you for your quick reply!

Even if I set price smoothing to zero, they still have some minor discrepancy: 

Why is this?

Thanks, 

Yes, because the original uses high and low for minimums and maximums, where the "smoothed" uses just one price (the one you chose in parameters). The "smoothed" is more generalized version than the original version

In any case you have multi time frame version(s) of the original Ehlers fisher transform at this thread : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/174980

 
mladen:

Yes, because the original uses high and low for minimums and maximums, where the "smoothed" uses just one price (the one you chose in parameters). The "smoothed" is more generalized version than the original version

In any case you have multi time frame version(s) of the original Ehlers fisher transform at this thread : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/174980

Thank you for details, sir. Yes, I found original version (Ehlers Fisher transform e alerts 2 - mtf nmc) which supports MTF. However, it doesn't support interpolation. The difference is minor and I will just use your smoothed version.

Thank you so much, sir. :-) 

 
mntiwana:

Dearest MLADEN

  I tried but it is impossible for me to handle in any style,it is too fast and strange results when experimenting,may be needs some other of your special treatment to it or may be some thing is missing because of unexpected behavior in results :) but all in all you knows better.

regards

Try this

It has 4 more types of averages that can be used for trend normalization


Reason: