Experiments ... - page 69
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
TEMA and Stepma: great balls of fire ): Looking forward to this!
grtz Forexblasters
The smoothed Ehlers fisher transform with the additional parameter of min/max smoothing weight (it can produce some interesting results)
The smoothed Ehlers fisher transform with the additional parameter of min/max smoothing weight (it can produce some interesting results)
The smoothed Ehlers fisher transform with the additional parameter of min/max smoothing weight (it can produce some interesting results)
2016.06.28 #338
The smoothed Ehlers fisher transform with the additional parameter of min/max smoothing weight (it can produce some interesting results)
Dearest Mladen Sir,
Can you please code MTF version of this Ehlers Fisher Transform - Smoothed 1.01
I will be verymuch thankful to you,
Dearest M
2016.06.28 #338
Dearest Mladen Sir,
Can you please code MTF version of this Ehlers Fisher Transform - Smoothed 1.01
I will be verymuch thankful to you,
Newer version of Ehlers fisher transform - the smoothed version (description can be found here : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/186064/page23 ) made multi time frame
Newer version of Ehlers fisher transform - the smoothed version (description can be found here : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/186064/page23 ) made multi time frame
Very Kind of you Mladen sir.
Starting with RSI
__________________
This experiment will show how important is to know all the phases of calculating something
The example is using well known RSI indicator, but by changing the averaging method used in the calculation, it allows us to have rsi that is anything but the original.
__________________
First the indicator :
Original Welles Wilders' RSI uses what is sometimes known as Wilders EMA. This indicator allows you to change that and to use on of the built in averages (SMA, EMA, SMMA and LWMA). And then you have, this :
You would expect 4 more types of RSI. But if you take a look at the result, you shall see that the original rsi and the rsi using smma for calculation is the same. And you are not wrong. That is supposed to be so. It is due to the fact that smma and Wilders ema are the same (regardless of the different math used to calculate it). It is less known, but from now on, hen someone tells you to use Wilders ema, simply use same period smma
__________________
So much for this "experiment"
He is using wrong buffers for comparison
Post the iCustom() call he is trying to use, and I will post the correct way how that indicator should be used
He is using wrong buffers for comparison
Post the iCustom() call he is trying to use, and I will post the correct way how that indicator should be used
Thanks malden,i have be waiting for him for him to send me the details, He is currently undergoing a minor surgery. I believe he will reply me soon
Ok he just replied.
double rsi = iCustom(NULL,0,"rsi_experiment",rsiTF,1,1); <- buffer 1 for down slope this has values or EMPTY_VALUE
mq4 attached. I removed all extern except for Timeframe
Frama ribbon (from this post : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/179671/page12 ) but with two experimental calculation methods added. The two methods are producing similar results, but both are having very different results compared to the classical calculation result. Wit the new method(s) some false signals are filtered out and the results are logical
And some more experimenting with the Schaff trend cycle itself - this one allows different average types for macd and signal calculations :
A lot of different STC values can be calculated using just the 4 ma types combinations included
@mladen it will humbly delightful if you can make this indicator multi-time frame