Dynamic zone indicators ... - page 35
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
...
Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa
Will do it
Hey mladen you forgot to add the 4th option T3 rsi,if you can kindly add this it will be much appreciated thanks
Don't worry about it
Hey mladen,"you're good money all across the planet in my book so don't sweat it!"I just swear remember reading somewhere around here that the T3 option on a rsi enables it to become even faster than the rsx which will make the t3 rsi the "fastest" RSI available,so to see the adaptive version with it will be nice to compare and review,thanks Max
Dynamic zone rasi adaptive ma MACD 2 ...
Max
Here is a version with t3 rsi added. Not it has 5 choices of rsi calculation :
Hey mladen,"you're good money all across the planet in my book so don't sweat it!"I just swear remember reading somewhere around here that the T3 option on a rsi enables it to become even faster than the rsx which will make the t3 rsi the "fastest" RSI available,so to see the adaptive version with it will be nice to compare and review,thanks Max
Great
Respect!,Mladen. I was hoping this was the case thanks,Max
Dynamic velocity differential
adeo Just checking : you would like the 2 in one as a kind of "composite velocity" and then we normalize it?
Mladen:
I'm obviously curious about this and check almost every day; if this idea is not good enough to consider I'm OK with that just let me know so I don't hope for it.
Thanks for everything you do here, it continues to amaze...
...
adeo
First problem (of which you already spoken in your post) s that, since the values that would need to be "combined" are in a completely different range of values and that they have to be normalized, otherwise it would be useless to combine them (the effect on the joint value of the "lesser" value would be negligible). But there comes a problem : each and very normalization ads some lag (which is a smaller problem for this case) and "deforms" the signal. So, where in the velocity there is some steep value up or down, in normalized version you would have a complete flat line (on the extreme, but it will be a flat line) thus preventing us to see what is velocity showing us.
In few words, I simply think that velocity indicator of any kind should not be normalized because that way we loose much more than we gain. And without normalization it is impossible to do a meaningful "compositing" of the 2 indicators you are talking about in your post
regards
Mladen
Mladen:
I'm obviously curious about this and check almost every day; if this idea is not good enough to consider I'm OK with that just let me know so I don't hope for it.
Thanks for everything you do here, it continues to amaze...Dynamic velocity differential
adeo
First problem (of which you already spoken in your post) s that, since the values that would need to be "combined" are in a completely different range of values and that they have to be normalized, otherwise it would be useless to combine them (the effect on the joint value of the "lesser" value would be negligible). But there comes a problem : each and very normalization ads some lag (which is a smaller problem for this case) and "deforms" the signal. So, where in the velocity there is some steep value up or down, in normalized version you would have a complete flat line (on the extreme, but it will be a flat line) thus preventing us to see what is velocity showing us.
In few words, I simply think that velocity indicator of any kind should not be normalized because that way we loose much more than we gain. And without normalization it is impossible to do a meaningful "compositing" of the 2 indicators you are talking about in your post
regards
MladenPlenty good. And, despite what I say below, I am happy to defer to your experience and sense in this matter.
Having said that and in the context of scientific 'discovery', I disagree on both counts.
Surely the 'dynamic' approach does not introduce lag - at least in the sense of digital filters. There is no delay introduced in the math; all we are doing is arbitrarily assigning a lookback window which is used to set the normalization level.
To your second point about losing information, the whole point is to show one contrasted ('differential') to the other. If there is a flat line (or a spike) that represents (hopefully valuable) information. In this sense the indicator would be a convergence/divergence composite.
Anyway, just my thoughts.
...
adeo
I did not talk about dynamic approach when I said that there will be lag added, but was talking about normalization. Dynamic zones are used (and I hope that we are doing it successfully) to avoid lag and I am clear with it. Normalization is yet another story (apart from not having a "perfect" way of normalization) when it comes to lag
Plenty good. And, despite what I say below, I am happy to defer to your experience and sense in this matter.
Having said that and in the context of scientific 'discovery', I disagree on both counts.
Surely the 'dynamic' approach does not introduce lag - at least in the sense of digital filters. There is no delay introduced in the math; all we are doing is arbitrarily assigning a lookback window which is used to set the normalization level.
To your second point about losing information, the whole point is to show one contrasted ('differential') to the other. If there is a flat line (or a spike) that represents (hopefully valuable) information. In this sense the indicator would be a convergence/divergence composite.
Anyway, just my thoughts.I cannot get spearman to plot.
Hello - I would like work with thee jurik/spearman indicator. I loaded the spearman dll into my library folder and attach the indicator to the chart. The name of the indicator displas, but not the plot. I thought I was missing the ds jurik indicastor, but I can't find that. Can you guide me.
Hello - I would like work with thee jurik/spearman indicator. I loaded the spearman dll into my library folder and attach the indicator to the chart. The name of the indicator displas, but not the plot. I thought I was missing the ds jurik indicastor, but I can't find that. Can you guide me.
Hi Eianetti,
May be needing the dynamicZone.dll on the first page and post of this thread, won't need the jurik indicator its built into the spearman.