• Get access

Requests & Ideas - page 308

Mladen Rakic
163289
Mladen Rakic  
dasssi:
this is how it works in my chart

dasssi

That is 4 digit broker. Set the Sensitivity or StepSize to /10 (not both, just one - step ma pdf works using points not pips)

RWP
537
RWP  
mladen:
rayphua

It already can be done. I simply did not take notice that it can (in some earlier builds I have tried that, and it did not work, and after that it slipped my mind to test it again) Thanks to cja, now we know that it can be done, and already tested on a working indicator (see this one : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/183798/page55 - it is using 12 drawing buffers)

Trying and testing some ideas how to do the job in the most efficient way right now, but since it is very similar to metatrader 5 ways, it should not take more than a few days before I start making already tested indicators using that extra capabilities

Hi Mladen,

Was wondering if did try converting CCI Study indicator into CCI Study candles with body and wick and allowing histogram changes with the additional buffers yet?

Raymond

Mladen Rakic
163289
Mladen Rakic  
rayphua:
Hi Mladen,

Was wondering if did try converting CCI Study indicator into CCI Study candles with body and wick and allowing histogram changes with the additional buffers yet?

Raymond

trying to figure out if among other undocumented stuff, now we can use what metatrader 5 has all the time : TYPE_COLOR_CANDLE

Mladen Rakic
163289
Mladen Rakic  
rayphua:
Hi Mladen,

Was wondering if did try converting CCI Study indicator into CCI Study candles with body and wick and allowing histogram changes with the additional buffers yet?

Raymond

Also, one more thing : been through the whole help files, and nowhere it is told that we can use that 64 buffers (they always tell that we still can use only 8 buffers). It seems that they even do not know that it can be done. It can easily happen that it is an error of some coder that allowed metatrader 4 to use the same number of drawing buffers as metatrader 5 in which case they will revert it

Nothing is sure with this number of buffers yet

Solariz
382
Solariz  

Hi, can we have this one as nmc please?

Thanks in advance.

gann_high-low_activator_djma_heiken_ashi_arrows.mq4

William Snyder
9493
William Snyder  
Gfuchs:
Hi, can we have this one as nmc please?

Thanks in advance.

gann_high-low_activator_djma_heiken_ashi_arrows.mq4

Hi Gfuchs, updated it to be nmc.

Solariz
382
Solariz  
mrtools:
Hi Gfuchs, updated it to be nmc.

Thank you mrtools

RWP
537
RWP  
mladen:
Also, one more thing : been through the whole help files, and nowhere it is told that we can use that 64 buffers (they always tell that we still can use only 8 buffers). It seems that they even do not know that it can be done. It can easily happen that it is an error of some coder that allowed metatrader 4 to use the same number of drawing buffers as metatrader 5 in which case they will revert it Nothing is sure with this number of buffers yet

Therefore in short, we do not know if it is possible but it would be possible to first try to create an indicator with buffers exceeding 8 and test it out, yes?

Mladen Rakic
163289
Mladen Rakic  
rayphua:
Therefore in short, we do not know if it is possible but it would be possible to first try to create an indicator with buffers exceeding 8 and test it out, yes?

Yes

But what are we going to do if they change it back?

I told a couple of times that I have been in that situation with metatrader 5 : made something only to discover the next day that I have to make it again simply because they have changed something again. There is simply no guarantee with metatrader that what works today will work tomorrow too

RWP
537
RWP  
mladen:
Yes

But what are we going to do if they change it back?

I told a couple of times that I have been in that situation with metatrader 5 : made something only to discover the next day that I have to make it again simply because they have changed something again. There is simply no guarantee with metatrader that what works today will work tomorrow too

I see, I didn't realize that about Metatrader. So how should we go about this? Surely there would be some sort of timeline as to what feature becomes concrete or be removed; we cannot wait indefinitely.