The Gold Space

is so good

The Gold Space has been purchased and used. I am very grateful and happy with this work and the great performance, as well as the good interaction. I am eager and interested in everything you offer and everything that will be presented in the future.

i have thundergold and smart gold hunter. but the gold space performed greatly and well in backtest and live..

EDIT: .

🚨 For anyone here testing XAUUSD breakout EAs — I think I found one worth looking at.

I’ve spent a lot of time recently testing Gold EAs on MT5, especially the breakout/scalping systems that are popular on MQL5.

I started with Smart Gold Hunter (SGH) because it’s obviously one of the popular names right now. I’m not saying SGH is a bad EA — it has a real SL, no martingale/grid, and plenty of users. But after testing it and looking at live-user feedback, I became concerned about how much the performance can change depending on broker, spread, slippage and execution.

That actually matches what SGH’s own MQL5 page says about broker sensitivity, and there are currently both positive reviews and users reporting that their live results don’t match the main signal/backtest as closely as expected.

So I kept looking.

I tested Gold House and several other Gold EAs, but the first breakout EA that really impressed me was ThunderGold.

ThunderGold was different.

In the author’s recent live history that I analyzed, I counted 34 trades: 26 wins / 8 losses, around 76.5% win rate, with a simple gross PF around 3.86. More importantly, the winners were allowed to become substantially larger than the losses.

There were trades around:

+$1,128

+$1,329

+$1,562

+$2,294

while many of the losses stayed roughly in the -$400 to -$600 range on that account.

That payoff structure caught my attention because I prefer an EA that can accept a controlled loss and then make it back with a meaningful winner instead of relying on recovery/grid logic.

At that point, ThunderGold became one of my favorite breakout EAs.

Then last week I found another one.

Gold Space / TGS.

And this is where things became really interesting.

I put the MT5 reports through a much deeper analysis — trade history, weekly results, drawdown, losing streaks, hold times, SL behavior, pending-order behavior, and execution sensitivity.

For the things I personally care about most — consistency, very low drawdown, controlled losses and avoiding consecutive losing weeks — Gold Space actually came out ahead of ThunderGold in my overall scoring.

In the historical period I analyzed, Gold Space was around 92% positive weeks, and its longest sequence of negative weeks was only ONE week.

No martingale.

No averaging recovery.

Hard SL.

Breakout logic.

Very aggressive trade management.

What impressed me most is how ridiculously smooth the historical equity curve is.

Now, there is an important warning: Gold Space is extremely fast, so I also found that its live performance can decline compared with the perfect backtest because spread, slippage and broker tick differences matter a lot. I’ve actually compared live trades against the expected behavior and seen that degradation myself.

So I’m definitely not saying “buy this and it prints money.”

I’m saying:

SGH made me interested in breakout EAs.

ThunderGold made me realize how good a properly designed breakout EA can be.

Gold Space made me realize there may be another level above that.

And now I’m testing an even newer breakout system alongside them, so I’m going very deep into this category.

If you already use SGH, ThunderGold, Gold House or other XAUUSD breakout EAs, I’d genuinely be interested in comparing your live results because broker execution seems to be one of the biggest differences between these systems.

Don’t just look at the profit screenshot. Backtest it, study the DD, check the losing weeks, and compare it with your current breakout EA.

I wasn’t expecting to find something that would challenge ThunderGold in my ranking.

This one did.

Ayush is a good developer ,authentic, product has good engineering behind it, needs vantage broker to best run !! +1 month with profits , patience is key

The product looks good; the developer is very cooperative.

사용자가 평가에 대한 코멘트를 남기지 않았습니다

This is an outstanding breakthrough EA that has the potential to generate profits over the long term. Like any trading strategy, it has both winning and losing trades. However, trust me—it is not the kind of EA that will blow your account within an hour or overnight, as can happen with DCA or grid/martingale strategies. Those strategies often make an account look great while it's growing, but when the market moves against them, they can quickly lead to a complete account wipeout. With this EA, any drawdown remains manageable and under your control. The developer is highly professional and has always been willing to answer my questions and provide support. As for the live trading results, you can be confident that they are genuine. All the signals and statistics are real—there is no deception here. I personally have the investor (read-only) password for the live account, and I have verified that my own trading results match the developer's. The only differences occur occasionally because this EA trades very quickly, so slight slippage may happen due to my VPS performance. That is a VPS issue, not an issue with the EA. I strongly recommend using an ECN account and following the developer's recommended setup if you want results that closely match the live account. Cent accounts are not suitable for this strategy. To further demonstrate that the live results are genuine, I will also share screenshots of the developer's live trading signals along with screenshots showing the investor (read-only) password access, so everyone can verify for themselves that there is absolutely no deception regarding the trading results.

this 5 starts for fast response for the author to fix v 1.8 , great response