ATC 2012 Participants : Your Thoughts
Hi doushr
I think .
1.The new market is not like previous years.(The previous market was trend.)
2.We just can not afford to trust backtest.
3. In the real Market client was disconnected to broker and some order was rejected.
4 .Multicurrency better only one currency trade.
Hi doushr
I think .
1.The new market is not like previous years.(The previous market was trend.)
2.We just can not afford to trust backtest.
3. In the real Market client was disconnected to broker and some order was rejected.
4 .Multicurrency better only one currency trade.
1.The new market is not like previous years.(The previous market was trend.)
I agree that the market is always changing
2.We just can not afford to trust backtest.
Not so agree on this. I find that the past history can show how good the strategy is.
3. In the real Market client was disconnected to broker and some order was rejected.
To some certain extent.
4 .Multicurrency better only one currency trade.
Definitively the risk is lower compared to trading only 1 currency.
How is your EA performing in the ATC 2012?
1.The new market is not like previous years.(The previous market was trend.)
I agree that the market is always changing
2.We just can not afford to trust backtest.
Not so agree on this. I find that the past history can show how good the strategy is.
3. In the real Market client was disconnected to broker and some order was rejected.
To some certain extent.
4 .Multicurrency better only one currency trade.
Definitively the risk is lower compared to trading only 1 currency.
How is your EA performing in the ATC 2012?
hi again
2.We just can not afford to trust backtest.
Not so agree on this. I find that the past history can show how good the strategy is.
Yes.We must used backtest but finally use forwardtest
4 .Multicurrency better only one currency trade.
Definitively the risk is lower compared to trading only 1 currency.
Yes. We must basket of exchange traded.
Yes I have profit . Unfortunately My program did not work properly due to rejected close by broker
| 2012.12.11 12:46:29 | > Executed: [SellOrder] |
| 2012.12.11 12:46:29 | > Executed: [SellOrder] |
| 2012.12.11 12:46:29 | > Executed: [BuyOrder] |
| 2012.12.11 11:36:16 | > Executed: [SellOrder] |
| 2012.12.11 11:36:16 | > Executed: [BuyOrder] |
| 2012.12.11 09:41:41 | Function: ClosePosition Error: 10006 rejected |
| 2012.12.11 09:41:41 | Function: ClosePosition Error: 10006 rejected |
| 2012.12.11 09:41:41 | > Executed: [ClosePosition] |
.
...
28.41% of the participants EA is making money. Are the rest of the EA being over optimised (curve fitting)?
...
That they did not take ATC seriously ?
kourosh1347:
...
Yes I have profit . Unfortunately My program did not work properly due to rejected close by broker
| 2012.12.11 12:46:29 | > Executed: [SellOrder] |
| 2012.12.11 12:46:29 | > Executed: [SellOrder] |
| 2012.12.11 12:46:29 | > Executed: [BuyOrder] |
| 2012.12.11 11:36:16 | > Executed: [SellOrder] |
| 2012.12.11 11:36:16 | > Executed: [BuyOrder] |
| 2012.12.11 09:41:41 | Function: ClosePosition Error: 10006 rejected |
| 2012.12.11 09:41:41 | Function: ClosePosition Error: 10006 rejected |
| 2012.12.11 09:41:41 | > Executed: [ClosePosition] |
Your program did not work properly NOT because some broker action. Your program does not work properly because your program might create unnecessary error and then does not work around to solve that error. Its better to avoid some error and even if you have an error, do something about it.
Your log shows that when you tried to close position, you had trade rejected error 10006, twice. Yet at the same minute, at later second, you finally close that position.
Looks like you only check for error from Trade Server . You should also check for other error as well, like Runtime errors, and then make an adjustment to your order send. What GetLastError() that you got when your trade had rejected error 10006.
That they did not take ATC seriously ?
Your program did not work properly NOT because some broker action. Your program does not work properly because your program might create unnecessary error and then does not work around to solve that error. Its better to avoid some error and even if you have an error, do something about it.
Your log shows that when you tried to close position, you had trade rejected error 10006, twice. Yet at the same minute, at later second, you finally close that position.
Looks like you only check for error from Trade Server . You should also check for other error as well, like Runtime errors, and then make an adjustment to your order send. What GetLastError() that you got when your trade had rejected error 10006.
Hi again phi.nuts :)
and Thnx for reply
I known why this rejected and corrected in new version .But on backtest is not return this code .
and I recommend read this page
https://championship.mql5.com/2012/en/news/202
- championship.mql5.com
My EA Blue Frog is performing a bit better in the ATC than it did in backtest. Still, I think it has a too large drawdown to be used in real money accounts without further development.
Hi again phi.nuts :)
and Thnx for reply
I known why this rejected and corrected in new version .But on backtest is not return this code .
and I recommend read this page
https://championship.mql5.com/2012/en/news/202
The article is not important. So can you answer this :
phi.nuts:
... What GetLastError() that you got when your trade had rejected error 10006.
Over optimization is the enemy of EA, not friend.
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use
Come, let share your thoughts on how your EA performs.
Out of so many participants, 124 out of 447 balance is > $10,000. 28.41% of the participants EA is making money. Are the rest of the EA being over optimised (curve fitting)?
I'm surprise that my EA works as back-tested and would work more on it. Basically I feel that the strategy is very important.