Discussion of article "The checks a trading robot must pass before publication in the Market" - page 12

New comment
 

Yeah... Such cool programmers... You should read the rules at least once. And you should also read the manual more often.

If you import functions from .ech5 or .ech4 files, the file must be on your computer. If I remember correctly...

In the market it is forbidden to use external libraries. Not only .dll but also .ech5.

And something I have vague doubts that with such knowledge you can write something that works perfectly...

 
You have to think outside the box. And don't get hung up on standardised notions.
 
Vladislav Andruschenko:
You have to think outside the box. And don't get hung up on standardised concepts.

Broader is what?

The rule "If you can't, but you really need it, you can" doesn't work here. And pestering developers with requests or demands to include .dll in the market will never succeed. Well, at least in the foreseeable future.

 
Alexey Viktorov:

Yeah... Such cool programmers... You should read the rules at least once. And you should read the manual more often too.

If you import functions from .ech5 or .ech4 files, the file must be on your computer. If I remember correctly...

In the market it is forbidden to use external libraries. Not only .dll, but also .ech5.

And something I have vague doubts that with such knowledge you can write something that works perfectly...

Yeah, I can't even... I can't even read... I was expelled in the first grade...
And I don't equate the rules set by someone else to the law, I don't consider them to be the truth in the last instance.
I strongly disagree with the market rule "Only one file".
Yes, security must be respected. But I do not cut it...but the authors of the works.
The impossibility of sending several files in a package with an Expert Advisor limits the possibilities very much.
Look through CodeBase and estimate at least approximately the percentage of works whose authors give not only the EA file in the article.
Are they all "stupid idiots who can't write"?

 
Vasyl Temchenko:

Yeah, well, I can't read. I can't even read. I was expelled in the first grade.

Maybe they didn't expel you, they just kept you for a second year, more realistic. There was one in our class, also called Vasily.

Only you yourself can believe in your honesty... and that with some reservations. Can you guarantee that someone won't put malicious code in a .dll? Why are you so angry? This is not your first outrage that you can't pass validation... Before you rage, look at how many new publications there were on the day you failed.

These very I...a should be cut not only for attempts to violate security, but also for the inability to understand what not to do. And those who try to stick compiled code into CodeBase, where open code should be placed.

 
Alexey Viktorov:

Wider is how¿¿¿

The rule "If you can't, but you really need it, you can" doesn't work here. And pestering developers with requests or demands to include .dll in the market will never succeed. Well, at least in the foreseeable future.


If we approach the question logically, everything that is downloaded through the market already has a degree of protection, so it (as well as indicators) should be available from the beginning.


That's why I don't see anything nerve-wracking in asking developers to allow importing from a library that is available in the market.
And it's not about the programmer's abilities.
The point is that right now the library section is of no benefit or interest to anyone. The library is downloaded, ok, but you cannot use it in your products.
So people who can't use the library won't buy it (that's why 90% of libraries are free), but it's also pointless, difficult and so on for ordinary users to use them.

It is easier to make a separate Expert Advisor or indicator that is easy to use.
Therefore, my conclusion is that the library section is dead now. And to make it work somehow, we need to allow using functions from this library. At the market level. And yes, I would ask the developers to allow it.

To say something, you need to have an idea about software, users and the market as a whole. Have experience in development and sales. Only then you can draw conclusions and throw loud phrases.

I'm not going to argue and waste time discussing everyone's superpowers.
This time is better spent on family or development of new ideas.
Imho. Tchk.
 
Vladislav Andruschenko:

If you approach the question logically, everything that is downloaded through the market already has a degree of protection, so to use it (as well as indicators) should be available from the beginning.
.....
That's why I don't see anything nerve-wracking in asking developers to allow importing from the library, which is available in the market.
.....
Therefore, the bottom line is that the library section is now dead. And to make it work somehow, you need to allow using functions from this library. At the market level. And yes, I would ask the developers to allow it.

Thanks for your understanding and support.
That's exactly what I meant.

Yes, I knew from the beginning that a test robot importing a library file would not pass validation. Just as this Expert Advisor will not work in any other terminal that does not have the required file in its library. But I will give this file to a friend/buddy or a buyer (not through the Market).
But I will definitely not be able to send it to the validator in my life (on 22nd February 66).
Sad.

 
Vasyl Temchenko:

Thank you for your understanding and support.

I.A. Krylov

"The cuckoo praises the rooster for praising the cuckoo."

They say that experience comes like sexual impotence, only with years... You probably still have everything ahead of you, despite the

Vasyl Temchenko:

(will be 66 on 22nd February)

That's sad.

Maybe in +600 it will be normal...

 
Vasyl Temchenko:

Thank you for your understanding and support.
This is exactly what I meant.

Yes, I knew from the beginning that a test robot importing a library file would not pass validation. Just as this Expert Advisor will not work in any other terminal that does not have the required file in its library. But I will give this file to a friend/buddy or a buyer (not through the Market).
But I will definitely not be able to send it to the validator in my life (on 22nd February 66).
Sad.

A dozen lines with normalisation of the lot, which are lying on the forum in many branches ...

What are you hiding so valuable?

 
Vitaly Muzichenko:

a dozen lines with lot normalisation, which are lying on the forum in many threads ...

What are you hiding so valuable?

The eleventh line, which is not lying around on forums. It is short, but it is worth a lot.
And, in addition, besides the obligatory ten lines, I have added something else non-standard, which is definitely not found on forums.
Go to my profile, you will understand what I mean.
1...5678910111213141516171819...27
New comment