I guess you're a beginner? Sorry this is not a recommended way of trading with RSI, you will kill your account with this. You should read about trusted RSI strategies in the article section.
Hey, thanks for the feedback!
I’m definitely still learning — that’s why I wanted to post something simple and transparent to get real input from experienced traders like yourself.
I’m aware this RSI-only approach has limitations, and I'm not using it on a live account. The goal here was more of a starting point to explore:
-
How RSI behaves without filters
-
What kind of improvements or safety layers could be added (trend confirmation, ATR filters, etc.)
If you know of any trusted RSI strategies or articles you recommend, I’d really appreciate it if you could link them here. I’m definitely open to learning and iterating based on real-world experience.
- 2025.04.15
- Ramazan Erdogan
- www.mql5.com
Hey, thanks for the feedback!
I’m definitely still learning — that’s why I wanted to post something simple and transparent to get real input from experienced traders like yourself.
I’m aware this RSI-only approach has limitations, and I'm not using it on a live account. The goal here was more of a starting point to explore:
-
How RSI behaves without filters
-
What kind of improvements or safety layers could be added (trend confirmation, ATR filters, etc.)
If you know of any trusted RSI strategies or articles you recommend, I’d really appreciate it if you could link them here. I’m definitely open to learning and iterating based on real-world experience.
Here's a good primer on the RSI indicator:
Relative Strength Index (RSI) Indicator Explained With Formula
FYI... The way that you're using it (30/70) assumes that price is always ranging. With a reliable trend filter, you can just as well take a bounce off the 50. The first thing that comes to mind is a plain old 200 SMA.
Also, you might try adding to the definitions of your trading conditions, e.g., if bar open is => 70 and bar close is < 70 then sell. In this way, at least you'll know you have a one bar level crossover in your direction.
And keep in mind that one indicator provides a wealth of data. You can evaluate the slope (up, down, or flat - I don't mean the angle) over the last 2 indicator bars or so, the span (distance) between bars a, b, and/or c and a level, etc.
Overall, I totally respect your desire to adhere to the KISS principle (Keep It Simple Stupid).👍
- www.investopedia.com
| Metric | Result |
|---|---|
| Net Profit | +$427.50 |
| Total Trades | 38 |
| Winning Trades | 68.4% |
| Max Drawdown | 5.2% |
| Avg. Profit per Trades | $22.4 |
Interesting. Keep updated about your performance.
You can combine RSI + BB (or) RSI + MA. but if RSI alone giving you great profit, then no need to combine with any
Here's a good primer on the RSI indicator:
Relative Strength Index (RSI) Indicator Explained With Formula
FYI... The way that you're using it (30/70) assumes that price is always ranging. With a reliable trend filter, you can just as well take a bounce off the 50. The first thing that comes to mind is a plain old 200 SMA.
Also, you might try adding to the definitions of your trading conditions, e.g., if bar open is => 70 and bar close is < 70 then sell. In this way, at least you'll know you have a one bar level crossover in your direction.
And keep in mind that one indicator provides a wealth of data. You can evaluate the slope (up, down, or flat - I don't mean the angle) over the last 2 indicator bars or so, the span (distance) between bars a, b, and/or c and a level, etc.
Overall, I totally respect your desire to adhere to the KISS principle (Keep It Simple Stupid).👍
Hey, I really appreciate the thoughtful feedback 🙏
You're absolutely right — using 30/70 RSI levels does assume ranging conditions, and it's something I’ve been thinking more about after seeing how the strategy performs during strong trends (it doesn't 😅).I love the idea of using a 200 SMA for filtering trend direction and treating RSI differently in trending vs ranging environments. That kind of logic makes way more sense for adapting to market context.
Also, that bar crossover trick (open above, close below) — brilliant. It adds structure without making things overly complicated. I’ll try implementing that next.
And yeah, slope and spacing between RSI bars? That’s next-level — hadn’t really explored it yet, but now I’m curious. Might even write a function to quantify slope over N bars.
Thanks again — feedback like this is exactly why I posted. If you have any example strategies or articles that expand on what you mentioned, I’d love to check them out.
Respect for the respectful tone, by the way 🙌
I believe the RSI filter you are using is a good one. But trying to backtest it for a longer period of time you will realize that market behaviour changes and maybe 30pips as SL/TP could not work always. In fact the choice of SL/TP can put you in an overfit condition which works only for the backtesting period. Generally my take is whatever strategy you use you should use your own insight as a major filter to be applied to all entries that are suggested by the trading system.
Thanks so much for the insight — really appreciated.
You're absolutely right about market behavior changing over time. I’ve already noticed how a strategy that looks decent on one slice of historical data can completely fall apart when extended to a different year or volatility regime.
The point about fixed SL/TP potentially causing overfitting really hits home. I’ll definitely explore more adaptive approaches — maybe based on ATR or even volatility bands to set more dynamic risk/reward levels.
Also, I completely agree about applying personal insight and discretion. I’m starting with automation, but I don’t intend to blindly trust it. I see the algo more as a suggestion engine — something that alerts me to opportunity, and I decide whether to act.
I’m curious — do you personally use any method to help your system "adapt" over time? Or do you rely mainly on experience and screen time to override signals?
I’m curious — do you personally use any method to help your system "adapt" over time? Or do you rely mainly on experience and screen time to override signals?
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use
Hey traders! 👋
Lately, I’ve been exploring the idea of building trading systems based on pure simplicity. The goal? To test whether a single indicator—no filters, no magic—can still deliver results in today’s markets.
So I built a basic RSI-based Expert Advisor (EA) in MQL5. And to my surprise, the backtest came out better than expected! 💡
💡 Strategy Logic:
Buy when RSI < 30
Sell when RSI > 70
Fixed lot size
Fixed Stop Loss & Take Profit (30 pips each)
Only one open position at a time
📜 Code (MQL5 - MetaTrader 5 Compatible):
📊 Backtest Results:
Symbol: EURUSD
Timeframe: M15
Date Range: Jan 1, 2024 – Apr 1, 2024
Initial Deposit: $10,000
💬 Let’s Collaborate!
This EA is far from perfect—but it’s a great starting point. I’m curious:
What filters or conditions would you add to improve its consistency?
Could dynamic SL/TP or trend filters make it more robust?
Anyone willing to share optimization results?
Let’s build something smarter—together 🚀
Looking forward to your feedback!