AI 2023. Meet ChatGPT. - page 108
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
So? The neuron tested positive for the doctor. Where's that neuronka? Forgotten, never had mass adoption. And GPT4 (then 5) will soon be in every iron.
That's the difference. Now AI is a trend that will be implemented everywhere.
Better ask yourself: if GPT4 and MJ5 will be available to everyone, in what areas will they be used?
Good thing doesn't mean popular, popular doesn't mean good. And if it is both, then the world is changing.
So it's all about the HYIP? Am I reading that right?
So it's all about the HYIP? Am I reading that right?
Wrong. The idea is that there was a qualitative leap in AI and the technology was made publicly available (free).
The hype did not arise from nothing. Hundreds of specialists implement already available quality technologies and brag about their successes.
Saving time to do their work has become a ubiquitous trend. Tractor versus shovel; a walking encyclopedia capable of dialogue versus a well-read mortal.
Until you write a list of professions where GPT4 and MJ5 (or analogues, here is an example of the best examples for today) can be implemented, you will continue to programme yourself for an outdated way of thinking.
So it's all about the HYIP? Am I reading that right?
"The AIs introduced in GPT-7-8-9-10 (midij etc) will be a doctor...
average mass solutions, with individual bias, laced with randomness (and all dialogues with AI and funny pictures are actually "tarot cards", the transposition of probability in the interpretation of cigans).
Is not intelligence. It's well and correctly interpreted search queries and intelligently for a particular persona given. By analysing the mass of incoming information. It's why twitter, facebook, yandex are so epically valued. It's what bloomberg, Reuters have been making money off of for the last few decades. That's why term. bloomba costs from(!!!) 10k/month, not just because it's trendy or bankers like tails
Don't assume that the technology was suddenly invented out of the blue. Rather its use for a purpose was invented and brought to the masses.
"The AIs in GPT-7-8-9-10 (midij etc) will be a doctor.
medium-mass solutions, with an individual bias, laced with randomness (and all the dialogues with AI and funny pictures are actually "tarot cards", the transposition of probability in the interpretation of the Cigans).
Isnot intelligence. It's well and correctly interpreted search queries and intelligently for a particular persona given. By analysing the mass of incoming information. It's why twitter, facebook, yandex are so epically valued. It's what bloomberg, Reuters have been making money off of for the last few decades. Term. bloomba is why it costs from(!!!) 10k/month, not just because it's trendy or bankers like tails
Don't assume that the technology was suddenly invented out of the blue. Rather its use for a purpose was invented and brought to the masses.
I agree, it's not intelligence.
In my opinion, it is a statistical copy of human intelligence, erected on the basis of hundreds of gigabytes of texts and "enlivened" by algorithms of interactivity.
That's what's frustrating.
Intelligence is not understood, but stupidly copied by a neural network.
Wrong. The idea is that there was a qualitative leap in AI and the technology was made publicly available (free).
The hype did not arise from nothing. Hundreds of specialists implement already available quality technologies and brag about their successes.
Saving time to do their work has become a ubiquitous trend. Tractor versus shovel; a walking encyclopedia capable of dialogue versus a well-read mortal.
Until you write a list of professions where GPT4 and MJ5 (or analogues, here is an example of the best examples for today)can be implemented , you will continue to programme yourself for an outdated way of thinking.
I suggest you to write this list, since you are so enthusiastic. And we will analyse together how much they are needed there.
"The AIs in GPT-7-8-9-10 (midij etc) will be a doctor.
medium-mass solutions, with an individual bias, laced with randomness (and all the dialogues with AI and funny pictures are actually "tarot cards", the transposition of probability in the interpretation of the Cigans).
Is not intelligence. It's well and correctly interpreted search queries and intelligently for a particular persona given. By analysing the mass of incoming information. It's why twitter, facebook, yandex are so epically valued. It's what bloomberg, Reuters have been making money off of for the last few decades. Term. bloomba is why it costs from(!!!) 10k/month, not just because it's trendy or bankers like tails
Don't assume that the technology was suddenly invented out of the blue. Rather its use for a purpose was invented and brought to the masses.
"Mid-mass solutions laced with randomness" - spot on).
So it's all about the HYIP? Am I reading that right?
There were problems with Watson when it was introduced into the normal, everyday work of a doctor. I don't remember what exactly, but there was an article with a breakdown of why it didn't work. By the way, you can ask the AI what was wrong with Watson).
There were problems with Watson when he was introduced into the normal, everyday work of a doctor. What exactly, I don't remember, but there was an article with the analysis of why it didn't work. By the way, you can ask the AI what's wrong with Watson).
Thekey reasons are complexity of implementation and high cost.
However, there are other reasons as well. It was poorly received by doctors. Let's see how GPT-4 is received now.
AI also said about competition in the market, but there was no model equal to Watson in that era.
Thekey reasons are complexity of implementation and high cost.
However, there are other reasons as well. It was poorly received by doctors. Let's see how GPT-4 is received now.
AI said more about competition in the market, but there was no model equal to Watson in that era.
I think there was also a problem with the legalisation of responsibility for decisions.