Pair trading and multicurrency arbitrage. The showdown. - page 282

New comment
 
Renat Akhtyamov #:

for some reason I was sure you'd understand.

I mean, my example is concrete, it's clear.

but you don't have a concrete example - how to count and so on - to make sure.

It looks like an advert for your invention, nothing more.

You're talking about air, unfortunately.

Wait for reports from real accounts, we will record the video.
 
Irina Kolosova #:
Wait for the reports from the real accounts, we'll record the video.

The reports don't get to the heart of the matter.

i.e.

what indices to take, how to calculate, how to get a signal?

It's not going to happen.

advertising in a word, developing the ground for further monetisation.

 
Renat Akhtyamov #:

the reports don't get to the heart of the matter

that is

what indices should be taken, how to calculate, how to get a signal?

That's not gonna happen.

advertising in a word, developing the ground for further monetisation.

You are right, any product should be monetised. At the moment it is not interesting. And yes I said that 6 pairs are involved in the assembly (we trade in the gap of 6 pairs against one), these are indices and stocks, we trade in big news, Nazdak, Dax Wall Street, Sp500.... A man can find a way to trade if he wants to.
 
Irina Kolosova #:
You are right, any product should be monetised. At the moment it is not interesting. And yes I said that 6 pairs are involved in the build (we trade in the gap of 6 pairs against one), these are indices and stocks, we trade in big news, nazdak, dax waltstreet, sp500.... A man can find a way to trade if he wants to.

If a product is self-sufficient, it doesn't need monetisation.

I didn't get it at first. You said, "we were surprised."

So you are advertising, someone else is monetising through your PMs.

 
Renat Akhtyamov #:

if the product is self-sufficient, it doesn't need monetisation

I didn't realise at first, you wrote: "we were surprised".

So you are advertising, someone else is monetising through your PM.

Why are you bothering? I'm not advertising anything. I'm showing that arbitrage is still alive. I'm not selling anything. Monetisation can be different. By the way, there will be a signal on MQL5 soon. Even with delayed copying, the trades will be in the plus side.
 

Now about the 420ms.

how fast are the ticks travelling?

That's the speed you need to achieve, i.e. within 70 ms.

and if everything happens on the same computer, 70 times less.
 
Irina Kolosova #:
Don't bother, I'm not advertising anything. I'm showing that arbitration is still alive. I'm not selling anything. Monetisation can be different. By the way, there will be a signal on MQL5 soon. Even with delayed copying, trades will be in the plus. .
Well, you've answered, already.
 
Renat Akhtyamov #:

Now about the 420ms.

how fast are the ticks travelling?

This is the speed you need to achieve, i.e. within 70 ms.

I can't get below 350. The fxblu is 400 ms or so. But we have an advance of 1500-2000 ms. And to write an exchange without delays is a lot of money.
 
Renat Akhtyamov #:
Well, you've answered, already.
Shit, it's not a signal advert. I just liked the thread and the name of the arbitration) I'm just chatting).
 
Irina Kolosova #:
It doesn't get below 350( There's an exchange there.... Fxblu's 400 ms or so. But we have an advance of 1500-2000ms. And writing an exchange without delays is a lot of money.

It's all here.

on the forum

Look for an exchange that sockets are involved.

1...275276277278279280281282283
New comment