Well, I can't say that yet. I have applied a lot of fancy things to this indicator. Let's see how they work on the next one. I've tried partial closes and many other things for the boo. The only thing I haven't applied at this stage is inverse pairs. I think after all the research this will be the last option.
We'll see, I'm not discouraged.) What if it works out. Besides, while testing this version I developed a good algorithm for 1 pair. So the labour is not in vain.
We'll see, I'm not discouraged )))) What if it works out. Besides, while testing this version I developed a good algorithm for 1 pair. So the labour is not in vain.
У меня один относительно простой робот успешно торгует с RTS-6. Вот сигналы от MACD и Pivot - что то можно с автоматизировать. должно поменяться поведение значительной массы участников в символе. Я таких людей не видел еще, которые создали прибыльную торговую систему
We've already read it. It's all clear, but in practice it doesn't work.)
It doesn't work, because there is no linear relationship between instruments, you know?
If there is no such thing, then there is no arbitrage, and all the beautiful capital curves are the result of optimisation, which will not work on new data.
Well, I can't say that yet. I have applied a lot of fancy things to this indicator. Let's see how they work on the next one. I've tried partial closes and many other things for the boo. The only thing I haven't applied at this stage is inverse pairs. I think after all the research this will be the last option.
Trying in vain...
We'll see, I'm not discouraged.) What if it works out. Besides, while testing this version I developed a good algorithm for 1 pair. So the labour is not in vain.
We'll see, I'm not discouraged )))) What if it works out. Besides, while testing this version I developed a good algorithm for 1 pair. So the labour is not in vain.
I wrote earlier what pairs should be used.
In the form you are trying, it will not work
Roman,
In my time I spent a lot of time on the paired, but to bring it to the end was not judged, went to the stock exchange (SYMBOL_CALC_MODE_EXCH_STOCKS).
I would not use the indicator - tandeminstrument. It is useless.
You can use the divergence of common indicators like Stochastic.
- % Stochastic divergence of 2 symbols (found in my archive, it is still MT4).
- Maximum number of fills ----- 2 (two) (at calculated levels)
- Equalisation of volumes (ATR).
Roman,
In my time I spent a lot of time on paired, but to bring it to the end was not judged, went to the stock exchange (SYMBOL_CALC_MODE_EXCH_STOCKS).
I would not use the indicator - tandeminstrument. It is useless.
You can use the divergence of regular indicators like Stochastic.
- % Stochastic divergence of 2 symbols (found in my archive, it is still MT4).
- Maximum number of fractions ----- 2 (two) (at calculated levels)
- Equalisation of volumes (ATR).
Thank you very much. If you can be more detailed, inputs bundles and so on. If you do not want here, then in a private message.
We'll see, I'm not discouraged.)
Why don't you read something about pair trading?
We've already read it. It's all clear, but in practice it doesn't work )
We've already read it. It's all clear, but it doesn't work in practice )
Roman,
In my time I spent a lot of time on paired, but to bring it to the end was not judged, went to the stock exchange (SYMBOL_CALC_MODE_EXCH_STOCKS).
I would not use the indicator - tandeminstrument. It is useless.
You can use the divergence of regular indicators like Stochastic.
- % Stochastic divergence of 2 symbols (found in my archive, it is still MT4).
- Maximum number of fractions ----- 2 (two) (at calculated levels)
- Equalisation of volumes (ATR).
We've already read it. It's all clear, but in practice it doesn't work.)