Advisors that work - page 13

New comment
 
Uladzimir Izerski #:

Why confirm what the blabbermouth says?

Georges has monitoring. It's called Start_2016 if I'm not mistaken. On "Al..." look it up.


I do not give a shit about all these PAMMs and stuff - I am talking about Shara!

I will only be glad if his PAMM will pop only in the plus, I will give him and to manage!

 
Fast235 #:

1. you seem to be a gramatheist, he may have collected ideas but not as code

2. i personally do not welcome his idea, the robot should be much more cunning, not just classic formulas

1. The ideas were already in the robots... Well, that's exactly what he did - he put together a number of plummers in the code (on MAs and other labuta) and drives them in a loop. It is clear that from time to time, when the market phase goes upwards due to the nature of its movement for example, then the usual shara on MA crossing will tear up the foam! :-)

2. He hasn't got a robot, but a lot of amoebas that will trade on the basis of market movements, especially on different instruments, of course, from time to time, but the question is that you cannot build a system that intelligently earns money that way ... IMHO.

The problem of choosing from this cumulative failure - it still has not been solved!

 
Boris Gulikov #:

So why give such examples?

Contests are entered by children (either by age or intelligence) whose aim is to amuse their vanity and get a prize of 100 (1000) quid.

I can give you an example of one of my fully automated accounts. But that kind of profitability doesn't attract anyone here. I would like more too, but there are more risks and more losses.

But what is there. Anyway, this is my account, not some fucking competition.


sounds like a good EA to me .!! ! in relation to a drawdown of 60 to a profit of 1490 is super. respect

 
Shoker free robot sealper from the market and ran it in the test. I have now downloaded a free sealper robot from the Market and tested it. My God, I had such a great result with 15 minutes: I increased from 15$ to 150.000. Without stop and suffered a drawdown of more than 2,000 points (on the 4h sign). I`ve been trading with negative traders on the fingers of one hand. If I were young, I would have pissed myself. But how can I trust such traders, who are retained only by the deposit...
But they do work, don't they?

i don't know how to do it, i can't tell you how to do it with my trading robots... i dont know if you have 10 of them and you lose 9 of them, you are winning. this is a good one for validation. i'm collecting them :)

 

Well here's an example of such a robot, it's a story from 2005 to the present day. with a fix lot. but the drawdown on the balance is 40 percent. No optimization, no stops.

What do you think expert?

but on other instruments not so good at all.

Files:
Sin_tstulo.png  159 kb
 
Borys Ivanov #:

Well here's an example of such a robot, it's a story from 2005 to the present day. with a fix lot. but the drawdown on the balance is 40 percent. No optimization, no stops.

What do you think expert?

But on other instruments not so good at all.

Without an equity chart it's hard to make any assumptions and there is no point.

 
Uladzimir Izerski #:

Without an equity graph, it's hard to speculate and there's no point.

But theequity drawdown is 40 per cent. for a couple of days. and then it recovers
 
Borys Ivanov #:

Well here's an example of such a robot, it's a story from 2005 to the present day. with a fix lot. but the drawdown on the balance is 40 percent. No optimization, no stops.

What do you think expert?

but on other instruments not so good at all.

the quality of the history is 67% . HISTORY ! HISTORY !


 
Maxim Kuznetsov #:

story quality 67% ... HISTORY ! HISTORY, Carl!


yeah yeah :)

Files:
Sin_totulo.png  51 kb
Sin_tztulo1.png  155 kb
 
Borys Ivanov #:

Yeah :)

This is impressive, but the bot only buys, not shorts.

The global trend will change and he will sell everything. After all, he is a grid operator.

That is why, it is just adjusting to the history, nothing more.

1...67891011121314151617181920...26
New comment
Reason: