A topic for traders. - page 36

[JRandomTrader]

The fact that the FORTS is now trading at 7am instead of 10am has already broken the picture. But the old algorithms still hold.

[Uladzimir Izerski]

JRandomTrader #:
The fact that trading on FORTS was opened at 7 am, not at 10 am, has already changed the picture a lot. But the old algorithms are still in place.

The time interval is undoubtedly important. Different TCs will behave differently.

Without knowing where the TS was created, perhaps in different time zones, it will be hard to take advantage of it.

[Uladzimir Izerski]

Yousufkhodja Sultonov #:

I think you should take a closer look at the information on trading potential D, which has a precise calculation formula and reveals TC potential in a timely manner, going into minus at the right moment:

I marvel at your willpower, holding on for so long.

But in the end you made the right choice. You closed it.

It was already obvious that the experiment was a failure.

I hate to be a teacher, but TC has a perspective. You have to work at it. Hard and not always rewarding work.

[Alexsey Minchenko]

Here are a couple of hypotheses on pricing:

https://aftershock.news/?q=node/363872

https://aftershock.news/?q=node/343418

Interested in your opinion. By the way, note who the author is))

[Renat Akhtyamov]

Alexsey Minchenko #:

Here are a couple of hypotheses on pricing:

https://aftershock.news/?q=node/363872

https://aftershock.news/?q=node/343418

Interested in your opinion. By the way, note who the author is))

It is only theoretically true and in addition it is written everywhere, and therefore they think so.

And if you reason logically, it's different.

It is better to approach it in terms of finding a compromise price.

For example.

I want to buy for 10 and they sell for 20. The compromise price is 15.

In this case, strangely enough, both will lose. I have spent five more, and the seller has made five less.

[Valeriy Yastremskiy]

Alexsey Minchenko #:

Here are a couple of hypotheses on pricing:

https://aftershock.news/?q=node/363872

https://aftershock.news/?q=node/343418

Interested in your opinion. By the way, note who the author is))

Around the same time the author wondered about the morality of trading) agree with the author.

[Yousufkhodja Sultonov]

Alexsey Minchenko #:

If you don't take into account marketing chips and exchange restrictions, then the clothing market is not much different from the financial market. If you remove restrictions with the exchange, you can create your own trading instruments with a price chart), such as pairs:sneakers/jeans, sneakers/socks, jeans/socks , because the usual clothing market aggregation is poor (if at all), then you can arbitrage these pairs and earn good cash. On FX, such a combo cannot be traded, the aggregate will not allow such a situation.

You buy cheaper and sell more expensive . You have to ask yourself the question: relative to what time frame is the price cheaper? Example:I bought on the market trainers for $ 100 (pair: trainers / dollar) / 7000 rubles to date, but in fact I spent 7500 rubles since bought quid this summer at a rate of 75 rubles / dollar.

PS: I'm laughing from my writing))))

In fact, we haven't got to the bottom of the "regular" clothing market yet. Suffice it to say that there is still no universally accepted formula for profit depending on the purchase and sale price of the product, the role of fixed and variable costs, the types of prices in the market, including real and virtual prices, the existence of a market and optimum sales price and much more. It is of no interest to anyone that, these basic concepts have found their wayhttps://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/1825 and this fact is surprising. They continue with the ancient. albeit fair concepts of trading, which do not meet the requirements of optimal trading conditions.

It is shown and, with examples, proven that there are 17 types of real and virtual prices on the market. Without recognising virtual prices, it is impossible to calculate the entrepreneur's profit and the conditions for maximum profit and many other concepts. I think we need to first deal with the "regular" goods and services market, which will enable us to take on the financial markets, such as forex.

[[Deleted]]

Yousufkhodja Sultonov #:

In fact, we have not yet sufficiently understood the "normal" merchandise market. Suffice it to say that there is still no universally accepted formula for profit depending on the purchase and sale price of goods, the role of fixed and variable costs, types of prices on the market, including real and virtual prices, the existence of market and optimum sales prices, and much more. It is of no interest to anyone that, these basic concepts have found their wayhttps://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/1825 and this fact is surprising. They continue with the ancient. albeit fair concepts of trading, which do not meet the requirements of an optimal trading environment.

It is shown and, with examples, proven that there are 17 types of real and virtual prices on the market. Without recognising virtual prices, it is impossible to calculate the entrepreneur's profit and the conditions for maximum profit and many other concepts. I think we need to first deal with the "regular" goods and services market, which will enable us to take on the financial markets, such as forex.

You can start by dealing with a tester, a real one

[Maxim Kuznetsov]

Vladimir Baskakov #:
I am not sure what to do with it...

buying vegetables at the bazaar, identifying 17 types of prices ???

unless the sellers are happy :-)

What the hell is a tester... he needs to know the basics, because he does not know a thing about economics, trading and Forex.

[[Deleted]]

Maxim Kuznetsov #:

buying vegetables at the bazaar, identifying 17 types of prices ???

unless the sellers are happy :-)

What the hell is a tester... he needs to know the basics, because he does not know a thing about economics, trading and Forex.

Viva the PNB!