Points VS Pips - page 85
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I wrote to you above -- percentages are nothing more than a quotation rule -- the quotation rule has nothing to do with the point.
do you understand?
one is flies -- the other is cutlets -- separate the flies from the cutlets.
it's "those percentages" that are the Points)
there are no other clauses in the West
Can anyone articulate the essence of the argument now?
Yes of course, the argument is that the Metcavotes have started using the term "pips" by calling their _Points" with them.
That's wrong.
it is "those percentages" that are the Points)
there are no other points in the West.
What does "the West" have to do with it?
"When you speak, Ivan Vassilyevich, it's as if you're delusional."
+ participation in the League
Yes. And this involvement will continue. The topic is interesting to me.
What does "the West" have to do with it?
"When you speak, Ivan Vassilyevich, it seems as if you are delusional".
While there are international concepts of word terms, and these terms should be used equally by all.
Yes of course, the argument is that the Metcavotes have started using the term "pips" by calling their _Points" with them.
This is wrong.
Once again, I agree with you completely. it's wrong. but that's no reason to make up crap for pips and percentage points!
There are international concepts of words and terms, and these terms should be used equally by all.
refer to the classics: "... look it up, look it up...".
But that's no reason for you to make up stuff like that for a point and a percentage point!
I don't make stuff up, if you read the internet you'll understand the definitions and how to use them.
We should not confuse achievements in competitions with a lack of understanding of simple definitions. as you know, in the vindictive 90s, most triplets and doublets made their way "into people", earned capital, while the "smart guys" remained on the sidelines. i mean that not all achievements should be proud. if a person does not understand simple definitions, then all his achievements, however bright, but a SEEK.
I do understand and know the definitions.
But, even in your post - you have written nonsense, because achievements - they are the RESULT!
"SEEK" - THIS is your nonsense.
What "glaring SEEK"? :-)
You don't need to know how a gun works to shoot and hit targets.