The power of C++ - page 14
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
That's right. On the digital output. Two fixed, and terribly lame palettes. But high (for those days) clarity (above Spectrum or Commodore), which for business applications was quite reasonable.
It was a good idea to play games on a TV set with an NTSC decoder. Then CGA could have given a very decent picture with the same sharpness as the competitors, and with the same colours as on the Spectrum or the Commodore.
Just think what kind of stuff people "squeezed" out of that same CGA on the composite output (true, they used dirty hacks and tambourines around NTSC colour):
I never would have thought such a thing was possible.
On Habra - there were several articles on the subject.
By the way, the Goody game was one of the very few that gave 16 colours on the composite output.
Unbelievable, I can't even believe it's CGA!
Unbelievable, I can't even believe it's CGA!
I had a black and white monitor, so this torment passed me by. I only remember that I turbo-pascal made menus and other interfaces in graphical mode and I was very proud of it.)
I've decided to learn Python, I don't understand why all deep learning frameworks are Python oriented? Although some support C++, C#, other languages.
I just don't understand the orgasm of Python yet, the language is slow, there are no special features, why everyone is obsessed with it?
Many people ask this question, especially experienced coders, it is believed that Python, as well as in case with Pascal in the past, is somehow easier than C and especially C++, that's why it is popular among students and teachers, namely they generate the largest stream of public content in the network, which is regarded as "popularity". The second factor of this phenomenon as it seems different "aesthetic" characteristics of python vs C. Python code is objectively "easier" to read, at first because of absence of parentheses, at second because of "swept under the carpet" low-level guts of daily operations, good work was done to optimize number of characters. As there is a considerable amount of people addicted to Steve Jobs-style PR, a bunch of aesthetic gurus appeared, preaching these aesthetic features of language as "alpha and omega" in a sugary and emotional way. A cult emerged as well, a fashion, which is extremely important in the context of communication in social networks.
In essence, a language is definitely not a bad one, it's beautiful, and it's worth learning, considering that it's not that expensive. It is very useful in a social context, for sharing small snippets of code, showing the use of a popular library, presentations, lectures, etc. In short, the work on the public, and it is convenient to customize interfaces as a scripting language. But obviously writing production code in tens-hundreds of thousands of lines in python is not an option, step left to right beyond aesthetically pleasing solutions and you will face horror, and more often even native intractability, welcome C++
....
As a matter of fact, it's certainly not a bad language, it's beautiful and worth learning, considering that it's not that expensive. It is very handy in a social context, for sharing small snippets of copied code demonstrating the use of a popular library, presentations, lectures, etc., in short, work for the public, and it is also convenient to customize interfaces, as a scripting language. But obviously writing production code in tens-hundreds of thousands of lines in Python is not an option, step left to right outside of aesthetically pleasing solutions and you are faced with horror, and more often with a native insolubility, welcome C++
We don't need it all. The results are to open a deal, close a deal, and that's it. Python is slow. What's the hurry, exactly? Suppose there is a second delay between opening and closing. The deal may be 5 or even 2 minutes. What do we need 2s? -Forget about it.
And you know all about Python packages-modules.
C++ is a wonderful language, but you don't need it here. But if you like it, you're welcome to use it.
We don't need it all. The results are to open a trade, close a trade, and that's it. Python is slow. And what is the hurry, exactly? Suppose there is a second delay for opening and closing. The deal may be 5 or even 2 minutes. What do we need 2s? -Forget about it.
And you know all about Python packages-modules.
C++ is a wonderful language, but you don't need it here. But if you like it, you're welcome.
Forget about tester-optimizer. Speed is very important there.
You forgot about the tester-optimiser, where speed is very important.
I don't use it and never have. Only my tester. You can test-optimize in Python, too. Everything is very fast and, most importantly, transparent.
Ok, what is the best editor to use for python? I'm right at the very beginning, put up python from the official site, Anaconda, but something about this Jupyter is unclear, it's just an explorer of some kind. Where's the editor in there?
Ok, what's the best editor to use for python? I'm right at the very beginning, put up a python from the official site, Anaconda, but something about this Jupyter is unclear, just an explorer of some kind. Where's the editor in there?
Spyder is a development environment, all in one.
Thanks, I'll give it a try.